User talk:Shifasabaat
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Shifasabaat, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Sharia, have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.
If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and how to develop articles
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Article wizard for creating new articles
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! NeilN talk to me 23:03, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
October 2015
[edit]
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Sharia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:17, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Sharia with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
Shifasabaat, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]
|
Hi Shifasabaat!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
October 2015
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Elockid(Boo!) 17:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)