User talk:ShibAlpaca
Hello
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! Unfortunatelly, I had to remove your edit (adding Dogecoin example to Google bombing article) because it did not provide any reliable sources, as described in Wikipedia:Reliable sources. If you have any questions or just want to discuss things about Wikipedia, please visit Wikipedia:Teahouse. Anton.bersh (talk) 06:57, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
The University Transition Program
[edit]Hi ShibAlpaca, you're certainly welcome to revert edits you don't believe are correct as part of the Bold-Revert-Discuss cycle, but it'd be helpful to explain why you're reverting. For example, in this edit, I listed three reasons for removing the section (it was mostly unsourced, it read like an advertisement, and was written as a laundry list), but your revert didn't address any of these issues. In this edit, you undid some cleanup relating to reducing promotional tone and primary sourcing, but you marked your edit as minor (see WP:MINOR for the correct usage of the checkbox) and misleadingly said it was a "grammatical fix".
Collaboration is welcome and is an essential part of improving Wikipedia, but it's helpful to explain the reasoning behind your edits, so everyone can work together to improve the encyclopedia. Best, Politanvm talk 20:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)