User talk:Shfmaria

June 2016

Hello, I'm Kaobear. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Muhammad al-Bukhari has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Kaobear (talk) 19:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Muhammad al-Bukhari may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

lang-fa|{{Nastaliq|بخاری}}}}), commonly referred to as '''Imam al-Bukhari''' or '''Imam Bukhari''',]]<ref name=abdulmaujood>{{cite book |title=The Biography of Imam Bukhaaree |date=December 2005 |
earliest known ancestor of Bukhari according to most scholars and historians. He was a [[Magi]] ([[Zoroastrianism|Zoroastrian]] and died as such. As-Subki is the only scholar to name Bardizbah's

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:33, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Muhammad al-Bukhari. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Wario-Man (talk) 16:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]