User talk:Shezaad786

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Shezaad786, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

Time to stop

Let's just agree to disagree and cease this banter. I don't have the time to waste on this matter and have no intention of changing my position on this issue so why don't you move on, eh?Hkelkar 11:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Its time for people to be educated. You have still not answered my question and why should i move on.I dont know what your intentions really are. Shezaad786 11:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The title of the book says "Mohammedean". That alone is enough.Plus, you can search http://books.google.com for it yourself.Hkelkar 13:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attack

This is your first warning.This diff is a personal attack. If you persist I will report you and you will be blocked. Please stop.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Hkelkar&diff=cur

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you.

Hkelkar 13:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Very interesting reference on Tipu from youtube.If you can cite youtube can I also cite this youtube video [1] on wikipedia?Hkelkar 23:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tipu Sultan

Hi - as I'm sure you're aware, there has been some edit warring going on at Tipu Sultan, which has, from what I've seen, lead to some nasty accusations and personal attacks. Of course, these are things that we don't want in Wikipedia - we're building an encylcopedia, not making an informal forum for arguement. I have been called upon to mediate for, and provide my opinion on the article in question by User:Hkelkar, and am sending this message to all those to whom I feel it pertains. What I am looking for are reasons for the reversion (or, as I could be seen by some, content blanking) of edits by Hkelkar, which were well sourced (WP:CITE) verifiable (WP:V) and presented in a neutral point of view (WP:NPOV), in the hope that with this reasoning, I can turn the article back into a peaceful editting area. As part of this request, I would like you to consider that Hkelkar's submissions were well sourced, and that if there is a counter arguement against them, then that should be included too - the whole contribution should never be deleted. Thanks for taking the time to read this, and please place your reply in a new section on my talk page. Thanks again, M a rtinp23 13:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to participate in the issue (since you seem to be a single purpose editor) of Tipu Sultan's crappy article then plz cooperate with Martinp23 and do as he says. Otherwise don't whine when I start following his final recommendations.Hkelkar 06:05, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Mujeerkhan (talk • contribs • block log • creation log). As a blocked or banned user you are not entitled to edit Wikipedia. All of your edits have been reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.