User talk:Shertogenbosch

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address has made unhelpful edits, which have been reverted. If you did this, in the future please try to contribute in a more constructive manner. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Help contents - the main help page.
Quick guide - a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Trafford09 (talk) 11:12, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Forehand, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 11:13, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Forehand. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Trafford09 (talk) 11:14, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Henin–Jankovic rivalry

The article Henin–Jankovic rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It is just a repository of results and is unsourced. And how could we speak from a rivalry if all matches they played was won by Henin?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 17:42, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Henin–Jankovic rivalry for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Henin–Jankovic rivalry, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Henin–Jankovic rivalry until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 19:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Born This Way. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:22, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]