User talk:Gurbar Akaal

Recent edits to Battle of Jamrud

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Battle of Jamrud without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:09, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Got it.Thanks

Disambiguation link notification for June 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Multan

added a link pointing to Akali

Battle of Nowshera

added a link pointing to Maharaja Ranjit Singh

Fauj-i-Khas

added a link pointing to Kangra

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 19 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Sikh Khalsa Army page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Afghan–Sikh Wars

added links pointing to Dal Khalsa and Akbar Khan

Ranjit Singh

added a link pointing to Hazara

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mughal-Sikh Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wazir Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Ranjit Singh

Thank you for your edit today of Ranjit Singh. You may have seen this extract from the article on Ranjit Singh in The Encyclopaedia of Sikhism:

"The administration of Mahārājā Raṇjīt Siṅgh may be described as a personalized military despotism based on popular will. Designated as the Sarkār Khālsā, it was an absolute centralized monarchy, but liberal and benevolent. Its chief merit was religious moderation and practical efficiency. Though based on military might and sustained by successive victories, it was extremely popular. As absolute monarch, Raṇjīt Siṅgh enjoyed great power which he wielded unhampered for the common weal of all his subjects Hindu, Sikh, Muhammadan and others."

It seems to me that RS can validly be accused of desecrating the Badshahi Mosque, but that he showed considerable tolerance of the different religions in his empire and did not persecute the Muslim community. What is your view? Apuldram (talk) 12:28, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

-Hi Apuldram! Indeed, I agree with you. Sikh rule was peaceful and tolerant. Now, the desecration of the Badshahi Mosque cannot be accused, as you very well said, on RS. The love of justice, the continuous victories and the religious tolerance are all the reason why he is known as Sher-i-Punjab. Some theories cannot replace his grand reputation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:56, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Punjab War

You have blanked the page without explanation. I don't know the subject, it's the problem of basic rules - we don't blank pages.Xx236 (talk) 11:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gurbar Akaal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

An Invite to join WikiProject Punjab

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Punjab Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Punjab. I'd like to invite you to become a part of the many Punjabi related WikiProjects. The goal of WikiProject Punjab is to improve the quality and quantity of information about the region on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the WikiProject main page for more information.

Peeta Singh (talk) 10:32, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gurbar Akaal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Need Help

hi Gurbar Akaal, i need a help from you. In article of Bhagat singh in his early life it has been written " Bhagat singh a sandhu jat" (what thus it means?) it creats a misleading among readers, "Jat" is divided into three categories Sikh Jat, Muslim Jat and Hindu Jat. Bhagat singh was born in a Sikh jat family, when i edited this "Bhagat singh a sandhu sikh jat" there was a revert with the reason that he was an atheist and he never claimed that he was a Sikh . By seeing this point i edit one more time that " he was born in a Sikh jat family (as everyone knows) " and later he had become atheist. Again it is reverted , this edit-revert game (Edit war) was keep on going for several days as a result i was "Blocked". After Block has expired the talk has been started on this issue on Talk:Bhagat Singh where i come up with a proper reason and sources and they come up with an excuse. they argued that he never claimed he was a sikh (I agree) but he never too claimed that he was jat (only jat). I argued that "Bhagat singh a sandhu jat" means nothing and it is misleading where as we should change by editing that "He was born in a sandhu sikh jat family" but they have not replied till yet.

so i need your help to please support me on this issue on Talk:Bhagat Singh so that the talk reach its conclusion and change the article as it is misleading. here are the sources that clears that he was born in sikh jat family. Please see

As i mentioned first, the first three source they come up with an excuse that it is a weak source because it is a Newswebsite (but already there are many source from newswebsite mentioned in a Bhagat singh). then i came up with another source which is based on a book and they have not replied yet.

so, i need your help to please come and support me on this issue on Talk:Bhagat Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagat jit singh (talk • contribs) 11:25, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gurbar Akaal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Mughal-Sikh Wars for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mughal-Sikh Wars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mughal-Sikh Wars until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Lennart97 (talk) 15:33, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Requesting some article expansion help

Greetings,

Requesting your visit to Draft:Intellectual discourse over re-mosqueing of Hagia Sophia and article expansion help if you find your interest in the topic.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku, 'Encyclopedias = expanding information & knowledge' (talk) 17:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)