User talk:Shennational

Hello, Shennational, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Shennational, good luck, and have fun. TheEditster (talk) 11:27, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm C.Fred. Your recent edit to the page Fashion Ally appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 12:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to 2019 in film. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 19:23, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Addams Family (2019 film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:47, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pony (TV series)

The article Pony (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to pass notabillity standards

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SSSB (talk) 17:58, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zoey’s Extraordinary Playlist moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zoey’s Extraordinary Playlist, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can develop the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks, --DannyS712 (talk) 02:20, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Despite having been told several times about the need for sources, you have continued to add content to articles without providing any sources. I have examined a large sample of your edits. I did not see a single edit in which you made any attempt at all to provide a source for what you wrote, and in a substantial majority of cases I very easily found reliable sources that were inconsistent with what you wrote. Either you are being extremely careless, or, as CactusWriter suggested above, much of your editing is vandalism. Since messages warning you to provide reliable sources have had no effect, I have blocked you from editing for three days. When the block is over, please take note of what you have been told, and make sure you do not add any content which is not supported by reliable sources. If you believe there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, and then adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of this page. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shennational (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to create this page, until i discovered there's already an existing page before i created it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shennational (talk • contribs) 15:44, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I have moved your unblock request so that it will work - the block message directs you to place a copy of the text at the bottom of your page, not edit it inside the block message. The request does not address the reason you are blocked, so it is declined. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Perfect Harmony (TV series) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Perfect Harmony (TV series), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:15, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Outmatched, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 14:30, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on All Rise (TV series). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 14:38, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked less than a week ago for persistently adding content to Wikipedia without citing any sources, and that was after multiple warnings. Since your block expired, not a single one of your additions has contained a single source - not one! You either do not understand what you are being told, or you are refusing to follow sourcing requirements. Whatever it is, neither is compatible with editing Wikipedia. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:57, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]