Jump to content

User talk:Shenlyism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Pollack Jewelry (January 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 01:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Pollack Jewelry (January 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 23:13, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Pollack Jewelry (January 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 19:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Pollack Jewelry (January 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 23:59, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of Interest? Paid Editing?

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Shenlyism. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
  • instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Pollack Jewelry (February 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Shenlyism, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 23:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carolyn Pollack Jewelry (February 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 01:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Carolyn Pollack Jewelry, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Carolyn Pollack Jewelry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Carolyn Pollack Jewelry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:36, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Carolyn Pollack Jewelry has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Carolyn Pollack Jewelry. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Relios, Inc. (March 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:24, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]