User talk:Shellysarodnik/sandbox
Feedback on your article
[edit]Hello group NL2, Thank you for writing your article in your sandbox! I have read the article and would like to give some feedback to improve your article to Wikipedia standards and customs. While your tutor will judge it content wise, I will look if it meets the quality standards we have on Wikipedia. I standard look for a series of subjects that need improvement or are okay.
- Intro sentence: A good first attempt, but I have a question: Is there a specific reason why you did not mention the relationship to dementia? I think readers want to know this and is such an important aspect of this disease.
- Links: A good start is made with links, but I like to see more keywords in the article linked, including "cognitive functions", "brain disease", and many others. But a link normally does not include ", like you did in the paragraph under "Definition".
- Headers: are okay
- References: Thank you for the many use of references. However more references are needed: the common practise is to add a reference behind every two or three sentences. Please look for paragraphs without any references and start there with adding more. A single references can be used multiple times. But starting a paragraph with a reference is not okay. Please add references behind the dot, without a space before the reference, without a space between two references.
- Other: In de section "Definition" you used a bulleted list. I changed it so the numbering continues. Please watch for details: there are multiple times spaces missing or added to much.
I hope you can implement this feedback to your sandbox article soon. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 02:43, 28 May 2017 (UTC)