User talk:Shelleyboothbishop

Welcome!

Hello, Shelleyboothbishop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Logic Wireless, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard. Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Timneu22 · talk 10:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Logic Wireless

A tag has been placed on Logic Wireless, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Timneu22 · talk 10:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Logic Wireless has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://gizmodo.com/5437684/logic-bolts-second-projector-phone-makes-the-lg-expo-put-down-the-cake.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Logic Wireless. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Logic Wireless. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. bodnotbod (talk) 19:22, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LonnyBaxter

has been blocked indefinitely now. In case he comes back with another account to vandalize logic wireless report it here--Sodabottle (talk) 06:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm guessing you were the one who asked on my page about blocking User:LonnyBaxter. As Sodabottle said, he was in fact blocked for vandalism. For future reference, that is actually usually the better way to go when the vandalism is coming from a single account. Each time you revert the vandalism, be sure to put a warning on the user's talk page. If you use Twinkle (a browser add-on that works with most browsers other than Internet Explorer) there's a very easy way to give escalating warnings. The standard rule is that an account has to be warned 4 times within a reasonably short period of time (a few days to a week); if the account vandalizes more than 4 times, the user can be reported to WP:AIV, at which point they should be blocked. For an IP account, the block usually only lasts for a day or two (since IPs are often shared dynamically), but a registered account will often get blocked for longer; if the Administrator making the block believes the account is only being used for vandalism, then they will actually block the account indefinitely.

Page protection is generally reserved for one of two other circumstances. Semi-protection on a page prevents IP addresses from editing, but not autoconfirmed users (like LonnyBaxter). That wouldn't have helped in this case--it's used when a page is being repeatedly vandalized by IPs without an account, especially when there's more than one or the person is continually changing IPs. Full protection would have worked, but it means exactly what it says--no one other than an administrator can edit the page. Usually full protection is reserved only for when a page is facing long term attack by multiple dedicated vandals, or, more commonly, when the problem isn't vandalism but edit-warring (two or more users both editing in good faith but who can't agree on what the page should look like). So, for regular vandalism, the best method is warning, reporting, and blocking. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions.Qwyrxian (talk) 07:28, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]