User talk:Shelbystinnissen/sandbox

Moving Article into Mainspace

Hi Shelby, Lauren, Chelsea, and Allie, Just a reminder that since last session you should be moving your edited article into mainspace bit by bit. Remember that every time you save an edit, you need to write in an edit summary so that I can tell what's happening - so if you are editing the Ecospirituality mainspace article, your edit summary should include the phrase "moving over edits from sandbox into mainspace." And remember you can keep using the Talk Page here to hash out issues of how to move sections over, and you can keep using the Talk Page on the Ecospirituality article in the mainspace to hash out issues of where things should go, to have conversations with other editors, etc. MonstreDélicat (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^[1]

^[2]

This was really great guys! I edited very little, just a few commas/periods/capitals etc. that I edited directly within the text.

Ideas/Considerations (Emma):

- "Ecospirituality Studied" after reading this section, I would maybe title it Components of Ecospirituality? That seems to be what is primarily discussed

- "Ecospirituality has been studied by academics in order to understand its dynamics." Dynamics in regards to what? Does this mean components? Because the content discussed in the sentences after seems to discuss the etymology of the term ecospirituality, not components.

- "They then narrowed down their findings to the five principles of ecospiritual consciousness, which are: tending, dwelling, reverence, connectedness, and sentience." Ah, is this what is meant by dynamics? :) Maybe this should be mentioned earlier in this paragraph?

This is really interesting, but I think the listing of components and principles could be broken down even more, reading this leaves me with lots of questions about each list!

- "Women are controlled because they are thought to be closer to primitive nature." Are you saying nature is thought to be primitive as well, and therefore needs to be controlled? Are there more modern interpretations of Ecofeminism and spirituality?

Another idea for Ecofeminism: The Hindu Chipko movement (Hindu women + forestry!) http://www.oxfordreference.com.proxy.queensu.ca/view/10.1093/acref/9780199599868.001.0001/acref-9780199599868-e-203 Ask me (Emma) if you want more info :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emmaleefk (talk • contribs) 02:28, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^ Taylor, Bron Raymond. Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. Univ of California Press, 2010.
^ Gottlieb, Roger S., ed. The Oxford handbook of religion and ecology. "Hindu Religion and Environmental Well-being." O.P. Dwivedi. Oxford University Press, 2006.

[1] Taylor, Bron Raymond. Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. Univ of California Press, 2010.

[2] Gottlieb, Roger S., ed. The Oxford handbook of religion and ecology. "Hindu Religion and Environmental Well-being." O.P. Dwivedi. Oxford University Press, 2006.

[1]

[2]