User talk:Shelbyrogers/sandbox

The first thing that caught my attention was your infobox and your image. You did a great job adding those to your page. Secondly, your "Description" paragraph has some very useful information, which also caught my attention. I also liked how you explained the naming behind the common names in your "Introduction" paragraph. One thing that I did notice at the beginning was that you had your references listed first. Work on organizing your headings and also on being more specific with your citations so that they can be counted as credible. I also suggest that you add links to some of the vocabulary that you used in your paragraphs, especially in the "Description" one. This helps with the flow of your page, which allows the readers to more easily engage in the information you are providing. You may also want to remove references from your lead paragraph, since they typically lack references. The most important thing you, as the author, can do to improve this article is to provide organization throughout your layout and more credible information regarding your plant. More citations help achieve this. After reviewing your article I realized that my article lacks some flow to it. It is different when I'm reading my own article because I already know the information, but reading something that I know nothing on helps me gather more knowledge on making my article easier for others to read and gain knowledge from. Thank you for that point of view. Lastly, your word count only reached 624 words, so just make sure to reach 1200! Best of luck!Mdelgado11 (talk) 03:57, 16 November 2016 (UTC)