User talk:Shelby.slk600/Staphylococcus pseudintermedius

Just did a peer review, really enjoyed reading about your topic. I liked how it was to the point and can be easily read by the public. I listed a few things that could be added along with a few grammatical errors. Here is the link to my review: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shelby.slk600/Staphylococcus_pseudintermedius/Carley.lodge_Peer_Review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carley.lodge (talk • contribs) 03:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did a peer review on your article. Great job! I thought it was complete and concise, just had a few grammatical/ punctuation errors. Overall, it was an enjoyable read! this is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shelby.slk600/Staphylococcus_pseudintermedius/Clarissa.jimenez_Peer_Review#Overall_evaluation Clarissa.jimenez (talk) 01:00, 29 November 2020 (UTC)clarissa jimenez[reply]

Hi, sorry, didn't know so many groups already did a peer review for you guys! I just chose it because I recently did a culture on my dog and it came up with staph pseudointermedius, so wanted to learn more about it. So far, so good! I just had one question about the use of drugs in humans vs animals, but more for my own curiosity. (By the way I'm Janice!)

Peer review done :) I have also completed a peer review! -Amber.amc259 I believe the link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shelby.slk600/Staphylococcus_pseudintermedius/Amber.amc259_Peer_Review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amber.amc259 (talk • contribs) 17:13, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have just posted my peer review! If you have any concerns please let me know. I hope you find my comments helpful in editing your article. This is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shelby.slk600/Staphylococcus_pseudintermedius/Caitlyn.Barry_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review Caitlyn.Barry (talk) 22:45, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Completed a peer review for you guys! Well done, what's written so far is well organized and detailed with good sources. My only point of criticism was the reference for footnote 12 which does not seem to be working. This is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shelby.slk600/Staphylococcus_pseudintermedius/Cheryl_Linaksita_Peer_Review Cheryl Linaksita (talk) 23:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks really good! You Guys picked a hard one but it looks great so far. I left a review for you guys. Its moslty just on highlighting the importance of the resistance in your lead. This is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shelby.slk600/Staphylococcus_pseudintermedius/Madlyn_Lung_Peer_Review Madlyn Lung (talk) 12:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]