User talk:SheepNotGoats/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:SheepNotGoats. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, SheepNotGoats, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Garion96 (talk) 13:01, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Rod Blagojevich

Here are the Press Releases which the section is copied verbatim from.

Thanks!

I should be more clear, just look at the bullet points. Essentially, everything bulletted was copied.

[1] [2][3] --thequackdaddy (talk) 03:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I mentioned this to Thequackdaddy as well, but I thought it might be helpful to address you as well. Your recent claims on the Blagojevich page have a few things that make me curious. Press releases are public domain with information and numbers verified by the state, desgined for public use (and in the case of much of the media, often copying verbatim). Simply put, there is no copyright when it comes to press releases issued by an office. The links are provided right underneath each section, not even consigned to the notes section. So what is the exact rule. The credit is fully given. Furthermore, your (and Thequackdaddy's) consistent monitoring of this page to remove postive elements but to protect under-referenced and biased negative content on this page has me very curious to who would spend so much energy doing so. You have stated that this section should not be a soapbox; what do you call the more blantantly biased negative postings on this page. It seems no one has a problem with information or the rules if the information is negative. I'd appreciate a response (and a more thorough explanation of what exact rules are being broken); for now, I will edit the information I am trying to include and continue to repost. Firebrandliberal (talk) 21:25, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

You may want to check with copyright experts here at WP, but I'm pretty sure state press releases are not automatically in the public domain. They may be published with permission to redistribute, but that is not equivalent to public domain. Furthermore, even if something is in the public domain, that does not mean it should be copied verbatim on Wikipedia. Press releases can be cited as reliable sources, but actual Wikipedia content must be written in an encyclopedic style (which means avoiding the use of weasel words and peacock terms).

Also, please assume good faith here on Wikipedia. I have no political agenda or opinion on this article; my "consistent monitoring" of this page is because I reverted vandalism on it once, so it was added to my watchlist. If you look at my edit history, you will see that I have never "removed positive content" and the only time I "protected under-referenced and biased negative content" was with your edits, and this was only because you were blanking large sections of the article at once without an adequate explanation.

I may refer this to the WP:BLP noticeboard, since frankly I don't deal with biographies of living persons articles that often and my knowledge of their policies is not great. Hopefully someone over there will be able to help you out and give you a better explanation than I can! SheepNotGoats (Talk) 23:40, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

I've started a thread at the BLP noticeboard. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 00:30, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

SheepNotGoats, thank you for your help. I admit I came on harshly and under-equipped to know how to effectively edit Wikipedia and probably should have more closely read the rules concerning weasel words and peacock terms. I had called the Illinois offices the releases had concerned and their representatives informed me they did not have copyright issues, but now I understand it's more an issue of formatting. As for the blanking, I also admit I simply didn't know what I was doing. Thank you for the advice (and for checking for vandalism, one of the reasons I got heated about the Governor's page in the first place); I would like to still include the information on the Governor's initatives, but I will revert to encyclopedia language and look for some more concrete sources, as well. Thanks again. Firebrandliberal (talk) 20:08, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

My response is coming a bit late, but thanks for writing here. I may have come on harsh as well; there's a rule at Wikipedia about not biting newcomers, and I admit I am sometimes guilty of that. After reverting vandalism all day, it's easy to start assuming bad faith of everyone. Anyway, I hope you decide to stick around here, and I'd be happy to help you learn more about editing Wikipedia. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 01:16, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:MountRogers NRA.jpg

Image:MountRogers NRA.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Mount Rogers National Recreation Area.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Mount Rogers National Recreation Area.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:22, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Image:MountRogers sprucefirforest.jpg is now available as Commons:Image:Mount Rogers - Spruce-Fir Forest.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:35, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your attention

Extensive Solar panels are only massive in METU-NC campus LogicalSolution (talk) 18:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Um, okay. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 19:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

I am not sockpeppetry

Generally the south cyprus citizens pollutes the wiki pages related with northern cyprus.LogicalSolution (talk) 19:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Unwatched pages

John Reaves 19:58, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Biased

You're obviously biased against Clemson University. You should obtain training in the basic tenents of journalism, particularly neutrality and fairness. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Royphilpot (talk • contribs) 15:05, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice, but I wouldn't exactly consider these edits of yours [4] [5] as unbiased, or this one as fair (or anything other than vandalism) [6]. You may want to take a look at WP:NPOV to learn about using a neutral point of view on Wikipedia. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 15:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

About John B. Alexander

Please don't edit back without readon. Please give me the reason why you have to stick to the original description upon John B. Alexander. Why? Give me the reason and then change it. Otherwise, whole world will think why you guys stick to the minimum disclouse about this partiular person. I dont' know what is your relationship with Katharineamy. But, if you continue to hinder this disclousure upon one person, you got to disclouse also the reason why to the public user. We all have equal rights to know about information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4freedom (talk • contribs)

Sorry, I meant to include a reason in my edit summary but I hit enter before I got a chance to type it in. The reason I reverted your changes was because your content was uncited, and Wikipedia requires that all content about living persons (especially negative content) be verified by reliable sources. In addition, the section "Interview with Washington Post" contained personal analysis and original research, which is forbidden in Wikipedia articles. It's okay to cite the article and briefly summarize the interview, but we can't include our own analysis of it.

I have no relationship with Katharineamy, other than we are both Wikipedia editors who are trying to uphold Wikipedia's policies and principles.

I hope this answers your questions. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 14:21, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

How do you know what they did is negative? I didn't specifiy what they did as negative. It sounds like instead of your working at wiki but with other reasons. You gave me the reason of reverted as uncited. But, all your wrote or previous person wrote cited? there are things not cited. Why you didn't take it off those are not cited at the previous. Or you have a mission to describe the minimum discolosure about this person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.140.46.223 (talk) 18:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Most of them that I included have already mentioned in the reference. thanks, it is really appreciated, if you don't touch this website because I know what I am doing. cut off only the part that is not cited not all, if you have to. Again, keep up the good job, if you are not working for CIA. If you really have time for checking citation, please click the first link. It is broken, whch means all the information cited from there also have to be removed if your logic apply to all, eqaully and fairy. Isn't it? i also have a great photo of him. How can I upload this photo? Would you help me? Your comment is always welcomed.

Hi There - I appreciate your message and care in watching the content on this site for copyright. The content I previously added I own and have copyright to, at is part of a book I wrote. The sections I added were a gap on what's currently posted on the page. Thanks, James J —Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesJ08 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Notability Question

Hello SheepnotGoats, you recently requested my article on James Thomason to be deleted and I would like to state my argument. James Tomason is a talented local musician that means a lot to us in the community, he is in several bands and he is also in a church band. The reason he might not seem notable is because he lives in a small area of Oregon that does not receive much attention. Thank you for considering my request to delete the speedy deletion notificationJamesthomason (talk) 00:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi James, welcome to Wikipedia. Your article was deleted because WP has specific guidelines for determining the notability of a person, such as being covered by third-party, reliable sources or releasing more than two albums on a major label (for example). You can find more information on what makes a musician notable at WP:MUSIC, and if you feel that the person in question meets these guidelines, feel free to re-create the article specifically addressing how the person is notable by Wikipedia's standards. Please let me know if you have any other questions! SheepNotGoats (Talk) 00:43, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Delaware State Parks

Thanks for your recent addition of a picture for Holts Landing State Park. If you have any other Delaware State Park pics please add them. Specifically Bellevue State Park, Fort DuPont State Park and Fox Point State Park. Thanks again. Dincher (talk) 02:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

George wirth

How do you know it's an attack? it's in Spanish? Dloh cierekim 01:52, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. It would have taken me all night to piece that out. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 01:58, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Just got your message...watched Mike and Lisa Smith make the announcement this morning about the purchase of the Roanoke-area station (WDRL) and updated the articles to reflect the big change.

I graduated from Alice Lloyd College in 2002 with a BA in History and from Whitesburg (KY) High School in 1998. I enjoy editing and reading articles here. Hope to hear from you again soon. Thanks, Willking1979 (talk) 15:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi

I would be extra grateful if you could keep an eye on the following page: Direct democracy

The user Noelle Grant constantly attempts to insert a section in the article (see history) that it is disputed in the talk page. Unfortunately, I have demonstrated that he/she is wrong and he/she ignores me an continues to insert the disputed text.

Thanks in advance. A.Cython (talk) 23:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Question about an IP Block

See my talk page.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 02:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

High School Photos

I added a photo gallery lower on the page for Centennial. You can certainly move up one of the better photos if you'd like. I'm slowly making my way around Howard County adding photos. Wallstreethotrod (talk) 14:38, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

No problem

My pleasure, all the best Spitfire^Tally-ho! 18:23, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

ACP

Actually, I found out about the name change through your edits and thought to change the ASL page (and the acronym ACP page). Thank you for keeping the school current...it is a lifeline to the knowledge of Buchanan County. Chrisfortier (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page! —Archon Magnus^{(Talk \| Home)} 15:52, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Free Universities

There is only one free university. It has been in existence since 1999 and has had several thousand students in over 30 countries. There are over 200 free classes available. It is supported by Texas A&M University and now hosts all the course from the original Free A&M University. It hosts all the courses from the original Free MIT and offers testing and evaluation for learners using all 1,600 Open course ware classes from http://ocw.mit.edu It even has a bible institute called Free Open Bible Institute with over 100 courses on it as well.

If Free Open University, the only free university, is not notable, do not have a page on free universities because it is only one. If you do have a page on free universities we should be on it with all the other things someone might call a free university. It should be made clear that none of the thinks listed as free universities are in fact free universities. Scottprovost (talk) 13:12, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi Scott, thanks for discussing this. You can see my specific concerns at the article's talk page; feel free to respond to them there so that other editors can join in the discussion. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 13:16, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

I did not want my site or any site that is not a free university listed. If my Free Open University ever becomes worthy I would love to have it listed everywhere. It probably isn't and shouldn't be listed Should Wikiversity be listed? You can actually get a degree at our facility. We actually have a 7 acre campus and a 5,000 sq ft facility 1.2 miles from Texas A&M University. We have real professors and all out courses are given to us by the most notable universities in the world.

What I really want is for Wikiversity to really make available collegiate Independent Study guidelines and content they can have all the courses we have formatted on to Moodle and more if they would just be a real Collegiate Independent Study resource for independent study that is transferable to a real university. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottprovost (talk • contribs) 13:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey Scott, I mentioned this a bit on the article talk page, but Free University is a disambiguation page, which means it acts like an index to different articles on Wikipedia that have the same (or similar) names. The use of the term "free university" appears to be popular in Europe, although they don't use it the same way as we do in the U.S. (to mean free-of-charge). That's why the universities listed there are not truly cost-free.

Again, I'm not too familiar with Wikiversity, but from what I understand, it's meant to be more of a portal for educational resources than a structured learning program.

Incidentally, I like the way your school is using Moodle. I've used it a bit in the past, but I'd always found it difficult to get the layout and formatting to look decent. Yours looks really nice, though. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 13:55, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. The homosocratic method allows the students to do most of the work and keeps the cost so low that we can offer classes free. There is a university in Benin City Edo State Nigeria that will give you an accredited degree completely independent study if you prepare your essays and defend them according to our plan. I can make you a teacher if you want to post some classes. There are hundreds of classes we need formatted yet. At edocio.com we give away free Moodle sites to teachers who are willing to experiment with the homosocratic method. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottprovost (talk • contribs) 14:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Greene,NY

Thanks for trying to do something about the continual editing of nonsense, trivia, and junk into that article. It is all fouled up. Stepp-Wulf (talk) 03:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC).

No problem. I only removed the most egregious stuff, but I think it needs a lot more trimming down. The way it is now practically invites people to add junk, and anyway I'm thinking the "Local Businesses" and "Communities and Locations" sections should really only contain items that are inherently notable, per Wikipedia's standards. What do you think of cutting these sections down to only contain truly notable items (mainly items that have coverage in third-party sources)? I'll start taking a look to see what sort of coverage some of these items have now. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 22:56, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

I agree completely with what you said. This article has been drawing stupid additions for some time. What is a fundamental concern is that the editors seem to have confused the Town of Greene with the Village of Greene. I would have done more, but I am unfamiliar with the area and have difficulty in determining whether some of the material is mere fiction or outdated.Stepp-Wulf (talk) 03:23, 23 March 2009 (UTC).

re "Needs-image" finder

Sure, I'll take a look at it later today. Doesn't sound at all hard, so should get it done quite easily and I'll let you know then. Apologies for not spotting this sooner - two new messages at the same time, and for some reason the barnstar caught my eye. Anyhow, working on it. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 07:56, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Done! pre-filled example. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 17:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Wow, that's embarrassing. The exclusion category should be the category that should be added if there were no images - so you don't just find articles that have already been tagged. OK? That example should work now, I think. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 13:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Bugrit. Just have the web address [7]. - Jarry1250 ^{(t, c)} 13:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

My User Page

am I not allowed to have a page about me under my alias? even if I don't redirect my User page to it? because I'm not allowed to redirect a page to my User page so I tried to do it the other way round ^Az X eus 09:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

          ok I guess thats fair enough I think I was just being greedy and wanted a redirect to my namespace and true I am not
          notable so any info about me really doesnt belong in an encyclopedia. ^AzXeus 10:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Your userpage

SheepNotGoats, I noticed one of the IPs you reported to me vandalized your userpage. Would you like for me to semi-protect it against such vandalism, or leave it as is. - Gilliam (talk) 17:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Eh, it's probably okay as it is for now. It doesn't get vandalized too often, but I'll let you know if it gets bad enough that it does need protection. Thanks, though! SheepNotGoats (Talk) 17:58, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Templates

Please try to avoid using the template {{db-g8}}. As it says in the box that the template generates, it is preferable to use a more specific template; for example, {{db-talk}} for a talk page associated with a non-existent or deleted page. Using the more specific template is helpful to other users because it generates a more descriptive deletion log message. Thank you. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 19:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Unfortunately I use Twinkle, which only has the one option, {{db-g8}}. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 20:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

University of the People

I was going to nominate University of the People for speedy deletion. It appears to be a scam operated by the president of Cramster corporation to sell cramsters to people who aren't even going to college. While a clever way to expand your customer base for cheat sheets. It is not a university accredited or even involving professors. It is not free $100 per class plus the $60 optional cramster and the $300 tutoring fee and the $300 registration fee makes it more expensive than you local fully accredited community college.

It is not a Free anything but it is certainly not the first free university. Free open University has around since 1998 with hundreds of students and is graduating its first Doctoral student next month. Free Open university is Free and not a scam. Wikipedia Speedy Delete Free Open University because after 11 years in operation with over 10,000 learners server and hundreds of students, it is not significant. Mean while dozens of bogus web sites that are not free and have no professors and no actual classes are listed on Wikipedia as Free Universities.

Free Open University is the only Open University on earth that we know of. We do not require any thing prior to enrolling. For that reason alone, we can never receive accreditation from any accrediting agency in the US even though they agree that our quality of education is superior to many accredited institutions. We are even known for not requiring learners to chose or specify a gender when enrolling. alas, we are not significant but every scamming lying cheating web site is? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Scottprovost (talk • contribs) 11:25, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Hi Scott, at first I considered this article for deletion too; the amount of editing by COI editors and advertisement-like language of the article made me suspicious. However, it looks like it meets Wikipedia's notability guideline (mainly, it has been covered in reliable sources like the New York Times). Right now I'm trying to go through the current article and provide inline citations for things (or remove anything un-citeable). (For instance, I couldn't find a reliable source that supported the claim of being the first free university, so I removed it.) After I'm done, I'm going to take another look at the sources and facts that are left and see if it merits deletion. It's quite possible that the current spate of news articles is simply the result of a one-time PR blitz; we'll probably get a better idea as the months go on and we get closer to the fall.

I'm almost positive a speedy deletion wouldn't succeed at this point; the only terms that could possibly be used would be WP:A7, no assertion of notability, or WP:G11, blatant advertisement. But the presence of so many reliable sources could be used to assert notability, and I think the article is far less of an advertisement than it was before. If you want, you can list the article at Articles for Deletion, which would allow the Wikipedia community to review it and determine whether it should stay. Instructions for listing articles there are available at WP:AFDHOWTO.

It may seem unfair that your articles got deleted while this one isn't. For my part, it's mainly because this one's got reliable sources, like the New York Times and Sydney Morning Herald, discussing it, so that's why I'm giving it a chance.

As a side note, one thing I found somewhat amusing about "University of the People" was that they claim to provide education to "the poorest and most remote places on earth", which for me conjured images of starving people in Africa, but they require 12 years of schooling and proficient English and computer skills. How many poor Malawian villagers are really going to meet those requirements? :) SheepNotGoats (Talk) 13:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Also, feel free to post any concerns you have to the article's talk page. That way more people will see them and possibly join in the discussion. SheepNotGoats (Talk) 13:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

We at Free Open University have been battling the idea that admitting learners who do not have high school diplomas excludes a school from accreditation and have formed a committee for accreditation that is working on getting an accreditation facility for independent self study and micro schools. We have many people in Africa and other locations that can not demonstrate high school proficiency.

We are making the university available on CD for people who do not have internet access. It will display it self in FreeBSD on any 386 or later computer. Our new Free Medical School provides courses from Harvard Medical School and others and is being used to train workers in places where to doctor is not available. The $70,000 add campaign that Cramster dot com did in the New York Times may have helped inspire their coverage. Please help us (without breaking and Wikipedia Rules) become notable. We have several thousand learners counting on you. I do not think I can do anything that will not be immediately reverted.Scottprovost (talk) 07:22, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello- this is Daniela from University of the People. I just wanted to touch base-since there are so many intense conversations about the validity of UoPeople. We open our doors in 3 days- September 10,2009. Cramster is irrelevant to the University of the People and I am unclear why it would be added to the UoPeople page. A Cramster controversy is independent of Uopeople. UoPeople has been working tirelessly (staff and volunteers), to open a University, an opportunity to allow people from all over the world, who have received a high school education, or equivalent to participate in the opportunity to receive a higher education. And Scott- with all due respect, I am surprised to see you here so adamantly opposed to this university. You are a friend/colleague of Shai's (Founder and President) and a member of his Ning network who has posted many lovely thoughts. If you have any further issue- you are welcome to contact me directly-daniela.sztulwark@uopeople.org. A personal issue has nothing to do with the endeavor's of this university- who are supported and backed by the UN as well as many other high level people who will be donating their time to lecture to students online- for example-the Former President of India. Once I understand Wiki language well enough- I will be posting additional citations as requested. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Danielaszt (talk • contribs) 14:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your help with BLPs!

		The BLP Barnstar
		Your hard work on BLPs in general, and at User:Lar/Liberal Semi specifically, is much appreciated. That page has now been sunsetted (and I hope never to need to bring it back) but the work you did there (whether by bringing articles forward, reviewing them, or protecting them... or even by questioning or criticizing the process!) was of great help to the project. See you in the trenches! ++Lar: t/c 01:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Horrors! A sockpuppet!

There, I've edited since November 1. Is everyone happy now? Does this mean I'm not a sock? SheepNotGoats (Talk) 20:01, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Picture of serpentine leaf miner

Dear reader, If I understand it well, you placed the picture of the larvae in the Serpentine leaf miner article. There is a problem here: larvae of higher flies, Agromyzidae included, are maggots, without a recognisable head, and without feet. The larvae on thepicture clearly are different. I guess they are Nepticulids, but that's not relevant now. I would urgently suggest to remove the picture.

Sincerely Willem N Ellis wnellis@bladmineerders.nl ---- —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wnellis (talk • contribs) 08:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Willem, thanks for contacting me about this possible error. Unfortunately I'm not an entomologist, and I took this picture from the Bugwood network [8], a reputable entomology site run by the University of Georgia. While it's fully possible that UGA made a mistake in identification (or the photographer, who was employed by USDA/ARS), I would need to see more evidence of this before removing the image. Wikipedia is based on information verified in reliable sources, and I would feel more comfortable having another reliable source clearly demonstrate that this picture is incorrect (ideally, another reliable photo of this species), rather than a general assertion that larvae of this family don't look like this. For example, this ARS photo of Liriomyza langei [9] has a recognizable head, and this UFL page [10] describes Liriomyza sativae larvae as having visible mouthparts. If the photo is wrong, I apologize, and I hope we can verify this one way or the other. SheepNotGoats (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Pakistani Milltary High Command Update

Dear. You are doing wonderful contributions on Wikipedia. I have found some updated information about Pakistani Generals, to get update please visit the site below. http://pakarmygenerals.isgreat.org Regards --115.167.0.38 (talk) 07:45, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

wut? SheepNotGoats (talk) 19:10, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Help needed

Hi, I have a large amount of changes to make on behalf of University of the People and Shai Reshef. I have tried changing the pages a few times but the changes have been rejected by you. I tried using the sandbox but I cannot succeed. I need help in editing these pages. Can you please help me with this issue? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Taliagw (talk • contribs) 08:50, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Credo account

Hello! ;) I have seen your message in the Credo account's page. I am Lucas, sysop on it.wiki with over 35k total edits all around the wiki's world. It is possibile to just pass the account via email or is there a particular porcedure? Thanks! --Lucas (talk) 00:27, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Frankly, I'm not sure how it would work, but I assume they would go down the list of people on the sign-up sheet in order. Also, the username login they gave me is my personal email address, so ideally I'd prefer to get that switched to a generic login before giving it to someone, but I don't know if that's possible. Others have asked on the talk page, so far there hasn't been a clear answer. Maybe try asking there? SheepNotGoats (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I agree, and I'll put a line there, thanks ;) --Lucas (talk) 07:06, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

MVP

I took it out as promo rather than copyvio - I couldn't see that text in the site quoted. Definitely promo, though. 'We meet at...' and 'please contact...'. Killers for an article, those... Peridon (talk) 17:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Hm, weird, I think it was the intro text on their homepage (right above the "next meeting" graphic), but the end result is the same at least. Thanks! SheepNotGoats (talk) 17:59, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Copyvio at File:Clif Bar.jpg

Okay, got it. But your photo is inaccurate, as the packaging has recently changed. If I were to post a photo of the new packaging that I took with my own camera, would that work? Seriously, thanks for clarifying this.--Artie04 (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Sure that would be fine. My photo is pretty grainy anyway. SheepNotGoats (talk) 17:21, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

Link to Survey (should take between 5-10 minutes): http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/N8FQ6MM

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi^{t | c} 17:32, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Please proofread Western School of Technology

Hi, SheepNotGoats. I am JHUbal27 and I have recently made several changes to Western School of Technology and Environmental Science. Please help me to proofread the article and remove the extra ']]' and '[[' tags if needed. Thank you and feel free to leave a message on my talk page. JHUbal27 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:09, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

File:United States National Agricultural Library.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:United States National Agricultural Library.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:20, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Credo

Hey SheepNotGoats, if you still want to give back your Credo access, could you please fill out this short form? Thanks, Nikkimaria (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Sure, although I have no idea which email I used to sign up for it, so if that is absolutely necessary, it may take some time to find it. SheepNotGoats (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Okay I've found the email address and submitted the form. SheepNotGoats (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Dato Sri Mohd Najib Bin Tun Hj Abd Razak listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dato Sri Mohd Najib Bin Tun Hj Abd Razak. Since you had some involvement with the Dato Sri Mohd Najib Bin Tun Hj Abd Razak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alexander Iskandar (talk) 03:12, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of colleges and universities in Virginia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint Paul's College and Elizabeth College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

I will fix these, thanks bot. SheepNotGoats (talk) 12:06, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:ItmannStore.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:ItmannStore.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 09:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Image updated with proof of public domain status. SheepNotGoats (talk) 11:51, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SheepNotGoats. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SheepNotGoats. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SheepNotGoats. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)