User talk:Shedoesit

October 2022

Hello Shedoesit. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to BGI Group, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Shedoesit. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Shedoesit|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Amigao (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Amigao, I work in the Genomics field and interested in any company work in this sector. But, your cynicism towards the Company is pretty visible though.

Your behavior towards other editors who disagree with your edits are very disappointing. You keep reverting edits without discussion when others call for it. [1] [2]

You probably should read the WP:PILLARS when you get time, especially the WP:5P4

Please stop acting like you own all the Chinese related articles in Wikipedia. Shedoesit (talk) 07:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to BGI Genomics, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Shedoesit, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Shedoesit|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Amigao (talk) 17:24, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have already informed you that I have no conflict of interest in this case. I haven't done any promotional edit on the topic, but just fixed your malicious wrong edits. Shedoesit (talk) 17:28, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should consider reviewing WP:ASPERSIONS. - Amigao (talk) 02:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]