User talk:Shawei Sted

Welcome!

Hello, Shawei Sted, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Energy medicine does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Alexbrn (talk) 16:35, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Please help me with...

I want to make changes to an article I believe is not neutral. and my changes keep being deleted

Shawei Sted (talk) 16:41, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shawei Sted! Could you please link to the article? --Nerd1a4i (talk) 17:14, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. Here is the link. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_medicine . Let me know what you think. Thanks!

Thank you Shawei Sted! Looking at the Revision History of that article, it seems you have been edit warring. What I would recommend is taking a deep breath and stepping back for a little. Then, I would post your concerns of the talk page of that article. As for whether or not your edits are good, I need to look at it further. --Nerd1a4i (talk) 18:23, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Thanks for the breathing reminder!

Not a problem. Do have a good day! --Nerd1a4i (talk) 18:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Jytdog (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I made an addition to define what the generally accepted term meant/ where it came from and sourced the website of the author of the book energy medicine. Then I sourced journal articles to reference how long these separate types of healing methods have existed. It was deleted on the grounds that it was not neutral. Are you suggesting that sourced my input incorrectly, or that I don't know how to source credible works or papers to support my basic facts? The page I am trying to edit is being monitored by people who are super biased (I looked at the other pages they monitor) and all together are violating the neutrality component of wikipedia because their beliefs are biased. Instead of going to the energy medicine page to learn what it is prior to even forming an opinion, its introduced as pseudoscience with claims that sound outrageous without context. However, that is how they are presented. Not neutral! Thank you for your input.Shawei Sted (talk) 18:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Energy medicine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shawei Sted, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shawei Sted! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 31 January 2017 (UTC)