User talk:Shashenka

Hi Shashenka, and Please excuse this intrusion as you have been around a bit already but if no one has said it before: Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Good luck, and have fun. FWIW, Bzuk (talk) 03:28, 25 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

An invitation to the Teahouse!

Hello! Shashenka, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions, and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 06:05, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome :)

Hi Shashenka! I wanted to drop by and say hi, as I saw your profile at the Teahouse! I love the reason why you joined Wikipedia - it's the same reason I did: to make a change and make a difference. The more information people around the world can have, for free, the more empowered they can be. Pretty cool thought =) If I can be of any help, let me know, and we're here to help at the Teahouse - just drop by the Q&A page if you need anything. See you around! Sarah (talk) 15:37, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse Question!

I have posted an answer to your question in Teahouse here. --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 17:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another answer, and a general hello & Welcome to wikipedia. You asked how to go about creating an article: you do this (for an aircraft) by going to the wp:aviation#Announcements and Open tasks & click on Template:wpAVIATION creator & follow instructions. First thing you have to do is enter the artice name: do that, & a page with the generally used headings, the aircraft infobox & the specifications list box, is created. Easy. Only real problem is that you do need to make sure the aircraft isn't covered. The problem here is that, especially with early aircraft, machines can go under a variety of other names. Articles should be named according to manufacturer designation, but sometimes names are applied after the event by historians, or companies adopt different numbering systems. Its a general source of misery. Which is incidentally how I came across your editing: you added something to the Breguet Type III article (which I'm trying to improve & is on my watchlist) which was about a different aircraft with a similar name. btw when adding a referenced addition to a spec list, (which has a different ref for the existing content) if you add the ref on the same line as a numeric value, it stuffs the template parser, and loads of red text appears (frightening): the ref should be added to the |ceiling note= parameter. If its not there, you can simply add it. Any questions, feel free to ask here or on my talk page.TheLongTone (talk) 08:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks i just started two days ago is their anything else i did wrong or is that good? Shashenka (talk) 15:27, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing fine. I would not have mentioned the mistaken edit if it didn't make a useful point about being clear that you are dealing teh right machine, especially with with early stuff. I put in the bit about whereyou put the cite tag in the specs bit because one of the articles (a SPAD of some kind) Bzuk had attempted to put in the cite tag and even though he is a way more experienced editor than I am, he managed to guff it up.... nobody is perfect, nothing wrong with making the odd error as long as you learn something!TheLongTone (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that which is why i was asking about it so i could learn from it also i got two books recently from a bookfair all about planes in depth from 1914 or so to 2000 Would you be willing to help me if i get trouble inputing the stuff like I need to make a new page like i want to? Shashenka (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. As above, the basic page creating stuff is fairly easy. putting something in the problem...remeber wp has strict rules about respecting copyright, everything has to be rewritten. If you are writing an article from a brief description it's often hard to come up with a satifactory paraphrase. The way I got a grip on wiki markup code was basically by looking at the code of other pages, but you're way ahead of me on that, it took me weeks to get ref tags to work the way I wanted them to. (I do have problem caused by being a rubbish typist, & of course code is not forgiving) The most helpful are the simple ones. You can always try stuff out in your sandbox (there's a link to it at the top of your page & you can create user subpages. (problem with these is organising them so you can readily access them, best solution being to put a link to them on your main userpage.TheLongTone (talk) 19:34, 26

March 2012 (UTC)

interesting approach in all honesty i found someone else who used the same book as mine and copyed their code for it. I meant more that i would input the technical data. Also the book has tons of black and white pictures what about copy rights for that if they got it from someone else in the first place? Shashenka (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about image copyright issues, other than that the basic rule is 70 years after the creator's death, or date of publication when author not known. It's a minefield I don't want to walk into. there is a lot of stuff that is in the public domain, but basically I am more interested in aviation & other engineering technicalities than legal ones. But books should carry copyright info on the images, either below the image or at the back/front somewhere. A lot of British Crown Copyright up to quite a recent date are public domain.TheLongTone (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks I'll talk to you again if I run into any difficulty's or need help! Shashenka (talk) 21:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ref

If you want to add this reference source to many articles, here is the standard form:

Angelucci, Enzo. The Rand McNally Encyclopedia of Military Aircraft, 1914-1980. San Diego, California: The Military Press, 1983. ISBN 0-517-41021-4. (FWiW, note spelling, capitalization, punctuation, Bzuk (talk) 20:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC).)[reply]

Ok sorry I just started yesterday afternoon so i'm really new did i do anything else wrong? Shashenka (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that entries are placed in alphabetical order by the author (or title if no author appears), so that Angelucci would end up usually at the top of the list, alphabetically, not at the end of a bibliography. FWiW, just copy the form and then go to it. Bzuk (talk) 20:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Ok Thanks alot Bzuk! Shashenka (talk) 20:30, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Still some problems, all associated with being a "newbie", make sure if you are adding the Angelucci reference that you do link the information back to the page in the source. This is what I have done, in setting up a Harvard citation: use {{^[1]}} (read in edit mode to see the note.) FWiW, check: Breda Ba.19 where I made some revisions to your submission. Bzuk (talk) 00:35, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you :-)

		The New Editor's Barnstar
		Shashenka, I hereby present to you this barnstar, for your positive contributions to Wikipedia; in particular for adding specs to aircraft articles, and adding missing ISBN's. Keep up the great work! Mlm42 (talk) 04:09, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second that barnstar! You are really kicking some wiki-butt! Keep up the great work Shashenka! Sarah (talk) 01:09, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks both of you it means alot! Shashenka (talk) 01:14, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

By the way

Hi Shashenka; I've noticed you're adding a lot of missing ISBN numbers to references. While I think this is a good practice to get into, adding the numbers on a large scale across many articles can get quite repetitive, and is sometimes better left to people who use semi-automated tools (see Wikipedia:Tools).. then these sorts of changes can be made on a large scale with a fairly small amount of human effort. So that's just something to keep in mind; editor time is sometimes better spent on things computers can't do (like adding content to articles). Happy editing! :-) Mlm42 (talk) 23:49, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yah your probably right. Shashenka (talk) 23:52, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military History introduction

Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you have an idea for improving the project, we have a strategy think tank that provides a dedicated forum for discussing it.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! --Sp33dyphil ©^hat_ontributions 11:13, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:39, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Shashenka. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Ryan Vesey Review me! 21:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Issue at Sikorsky S-76 fixed

It was actually quite obvious once I stopped looking in the wrong places. :) See the teahouse for the explanation, I'm glad I could help. ʝunglejill 23:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much!

Answered your question

Hello, Shashenka. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Jayron32 22:12, 3 September 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Military history coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:52, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Season's tidings!

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:33, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{WP:Teahouse/Teahouse_talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|Picture problem|ts= Miss Bono (zootalk) 18:25, 18 April 2013 (UTC) }}[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Shashenka. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Shashenka. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Arctic Kangaroo 18:00, 26 April 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hello, Shashenka. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Deor (talk) 01:20, 27 April 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Britton Plaza Shopping Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GNC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re geographical coordinates

Thank you for adding geographical coordinates to articles that lack them! One point, though. The "dim" and "scale" parameters in the {{coord}} template do essentially the same thing, so there's no reason to use both. (Doing so produces a "dim override" error message by the coordinate-checking tool here.) And the "type" parameters, such as "landmark" and "edu", set scale values that are usually appropriate for the type of feature invoved—equivalent to "scale:10000" for those two types—so there's usually no need to specify a "scale" parameter as well. It's usually a good idea to show a location in some context on a map, rather than zooming in as closely as possible, so the "scale" or "dim" parameter should usually be omitted unless the specific situation calls for a closer or wider view. Deor (talk) 10:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much! Shashenka (talk)

Hello, Shashenka. You have new messages at Deor's talk page.
Message added Deor (talk) 02:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 16:50, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Advance Australia Foundation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Alan Jones

American Society for Nondestructive Testing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to NDT

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nigga Deep (album)

Thanks for reviewing the album Nigga Deep. Ben0kto (talk) 14:16, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Shashenka (talk) 15:34, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Shashenka. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by StarryGrandma (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Semihemidemibarnstar

Here is a semihemidemibarnstar for <Finding the archived link for the 315th Air Division>

If I knew how to use the Wayback Machine, this could lead to bigger things. AFHRA had web pages on every Air Division ever, but dumped them a couple of years ago. There are a lot of unmarked dead links to the old web pages -- if they were archived, too.

I tweaked the format you used on the 16th Bombardment Group article. AFHRA pages do not show an abbreviation for the ordinal, so the title of the page is "315", not "315th". --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:49, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for the barnstar it means alot! Shashenka (talk)

Need input on article

Shashenka, I need your help on this article for Amazing Discoveries....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amazing_Discoveries as it needs work to keep it from being deleted from Wikipedia. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. Simbagraphix (talk)

Also if could get your input on this related article for Walter Veith....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Veith

....Thanks.Simbagraphix (talk)

..... What can i do? Shashenka (talk) 18:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Shashenka. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nthep (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history coordinator election

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 05:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!

On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 20:38, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 15th century may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Constantinople: The Last Great Siege, 1453 |publisher=Faber |year=2006 |isbn=0-571-22185-8 }} (reviewed by {{cite web |first=Charles |last=Foster |url=http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-
*[[Juan de Anchieta]] ([[1462]] - [[1523]], [[Spanish people|Spanish]] composer of the [[Renaissance music|Renaissance]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:18, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Military history WikiProject coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shashenka. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Voting for the Military history WikiProject Historian and Newcomer of the Year is ending soon!

Time is running out to voting for the Military Historian and Newcomer of the year! If you have not yet cast a vote, please consider doing so soon. The voting will end on 31 December at 23:59 UTC, with the presentation of the awards to the winners and runners up to occur on 1 January 2017. For the Military history WikiProject Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent as a courtesy reminder to all active members of the Military History WikiProject.

March Madness 2017

G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.

For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military history WikiProject Coordinator election

Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway. As a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 29 September. Thank you for your time. For the current tranche of Coordinators, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:39, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shashenka. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Military Historian of the Year and Newcomer of the Year nominations and voting

As we approach the end of the year, the Military History project is looking to recognise editors who have made a real difference. Each year we do this by bestowing two awards: the Military Historian of the Year and the Military History Newcomer of the Year. The co-ordinators invite all project members to get involved by nominating any editor they feel merits recognition for their contributions to the project. Nominations for both awards are open between 00:01 on 2 December 2017 and 23:59 on 15 December 2017. After this, a 14-day voting period will follow commencing at 00:01 on 16 December 2017. Nominations and voting will take place on the main project talkpage: here and here. Thank you for your time. For the co-ordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User group for Military Historians

Greetings,

"Military history" is one of the most important subjects when speak of sum of all human knowledge. To support contributors interested in the area over various language Wikipedias, we intend to form a user group. It also provides a platform to share the best practices between military historians, and various military related projects on Wikipedias. An initial discussion was has been done between the coordinators and members of WikiProject Military History on English Wikipedia. Now this discussion has been taken to Meta-Wiki. Contributors intrested in the area of military history are requested to share their feedback and give suggestions at Talk:Discussion to incubate a user group for Wikipedia Military Historians.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:30, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 04:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Cheers, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.[reply]

Have your say!

Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March Madness 2020

G'day all, March Madness 2020 is about to get underway, and there is bling aplenty for those who want to get stuck into the backlog by way of tagging, assessing, updating, adding or improving resources and creating articles. If you haven't already signed up to participate, why not? The more the merrier! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are now open. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the coord team. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:06, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2020 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2020. Thanks from the outgoing coord team, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 05:18, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject Newcomer and Historian of the Year awards now open

G'day all, the nominations for the 2020 Military history WikiProject newcomer and Historian of the Year are open, all editors are encouraged to nominate candidates for the awards before until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2020, after which voting will occur for 14 days. There is not much time left to nominate worthy recipients, so get to it! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" closing

G'day all, voting for the WikiProject Military history "Military Historian of the Year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" is about to close, so if you haven't already, click on the links and have your say before 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 23:35, 28 December 2020 (UTC) for the coord team[reply]

April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive

Hey y'all, the April 2021 WikiProject Military History Reviewing Drive begins at 00:01 UTC on April 1, 2021 and runs through 23:59 UTC on April 31, 2021. Points can be earned through reviewing articles on the AutoCheck report, reviewing articles listed at WP:MILHIST/ASSESS, reviewing MILHIST-tagged articles at WP:GAN or WP:FAC, and reviewing articles submitted at WP:MILHIST/ACR. Service awards and barnstars are given for set points thresholds, and the top three finishers will receive further awards. To participate, sign up at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_History/April 2021 Reviewing Drive#Participants and create a worklist at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/April 2021 Reviewing Drive/Worklists (examples are given). Further details can be found at the drive page. Questions can be asked at the drive talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:26, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Angelucci 1983, p. 124.

[1] Angelucci 1983, p. 124.

[1]