User talk:Shashank Shubham

Shashank Shubham, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shashank Shubham! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Naypta (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

January 2020

Hello, I'm Alivardi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.
Alivardi (talk) 20:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Reliable sources: random websites / blog posts are not acceptable sources. utcursch | talk 21:03, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.
Alivardi (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Alivardi (talk) 14:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not wikilink "Sakarwar" to people's surname or place name. The whole name should be linked (have an article). Partial wikilinks would mislead WP:READERS. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:51, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ALL OF YOUR EDITS: Many of your edits are being reverted either because you are adding content without providing references, or you are incorrectly inserting urls into the body of the text rather than using the proper referencing format. Please learn when and how to reference. Otherwise you will become increasingly frustrated that your work is being reversed, and you risk being blocked for creating content that other editors are obliged to fix. David notMD (talk) 17:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Shashank Shubham! You created a thread called What do you think who Sikarwar Rajputs are? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amitabh Bachchan filmography. Do not wikilink surnames only. This is considered POV pushing a specific caste. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:21, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. utcursch | talk 16:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is for continuing to add poorly-sourced content. Your latest edits cite Kshtriya Rajvansh Bargujar-Sikarwar-Madhad by Pawan Bakshi: you claim that this book with ISBN 9388414160 was published by Bloomsbury India in 2018. However, Bloomsbury has published no such book and the ISBN is invalid, and the sole result is an Amazon listing which you seem to have added. Please use this time to go through WP:V and WP:RS. utcursch | talk 16:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shashank Shubham (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1stly ISBN of Book is: 978-93-88414-16-6 and 2ndly It is first published in 2019. 3rdly I am not claiming anything. Book Is already in my hand. You can video-call me on my WhatsApp number +91-9552906875 or G-talk me @shashank.shubham23@gmail.com to verify or help me out in putting it in the right context. I have not added any books on Amazon. This is the 1st time I am ever listening that I can do that. Thanks for being so prejudiced and mistrusting me. That book was already there. And I don't know why there are two ISBN (ISBN 10 and ISBN 13) in Amazon. §§§ Shashank Shubham (talk) 06:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't care what's in your hand. We care whether or not you are properly citing your additions. See WP:CITE. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1) Who is "We" here I am to fight against? You goons ganged up together. 2) Please tell me what I have not cited. I bloody hell mentioned the page number, ISBN Published date, and publisher Name, I have the book in my hand. 3) If you want to buy it I can share with you the number. But no... you are a robot or an AI i guess and not a human or a person paid by vested interest. 4) I asked you for your help by telling me that you can guide me by calling or emailing. But you are not doing any of it and having a monopoly. What the hell is your problem? 5) I am not experienced like you guys. But I like Wikipedia and that's why helping to add more information. Why the hell you blocked me. 6) Can you give an example of how you western born verifies things? But here I am seeing a 48-year-old guy bullying me by tagging me whatever you think you want because you are experienced and I am not. 7) Is there any Indian in this Wikipedia whom I can trust. What's wrong with my citing. I cited it properly. Can anyone video call me on my number? Any one from @wikipedia? Shashank Shubham (talk) 12:45, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended your block to one week for making personal attacks in violation of WP:NPA. You are free to contest this along with your original block. WP:GAB explains how. --Yamla (talk) 14:37, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The book is not the only reason for the block. In January, you were advised about proper sourcing five times, by three different people, but the next month you continued to add unsourced content, circular references, and a random blog post as source.

As for the book, feel free to post the cover page / publisher info page of the book on any image sharing website to verify what you're saying. The 13-digit ISBN 978-93-88414-16-6 is equivalent to 10-digit ISBN 93-88414-16-0: neither can be found on Bloomsbury's website. Searching for the author's name or the book's title doesn't help either. You used the book to cite the claim that Mathandeva's inscription mentions the word "Badgurjara": this statement is factually incorrect (see inscription text), and raises further suspicion. utcursch | talk 17:22, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrator Yamla I will contest this block but I will contest my original block and for that I am talking to utcursch. And let me tell you why I will not contest because you are the person who personally attacked me by saying "WE don't CARE" 1st you ganged up against me by using "WE" than you said you don't "CARE" about what I have. Is this the way to convey a message? Are you an Idiot Artificial Intelligence? You did the 1st personal attack, you moron. Tell this kind of words to your brother or to your colleagues or even to a stranger. Human is "Social" "Animal". Don't try to hurt somebody's emotion, you bloody narcissist. Is this the way your country taught you to behave? That you don't care? SEEMS like you are the behaving like TRUMP who doesn't care if PARIS climates fails...! Then you must be against EDWARD SNOWDEN also you CIA agent with no right and wrong.. just POWER show off the guy. We here care for nobody gets hurt and let EVERYBODY finds the truth. If I did some mistake I will correct it. If there is a free online you-tube video course then suggest to me, you NARCISSIST and don't indulge your leg when I am talking to someone. Now I have offended you enough. Now you are free to feed your EGO and block me for years.... But oh wait.... you are the one who said that you don't care what's in my hand.... then why the bloody hell should you care whats I am typing. Oh.. sorry you got offended by my personal attack.... but then you didn't realize you are the one to attack me 1st... oh boy!! Sorry.Shashank Shubham (talk) 09:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In January, I was advised by Aliwardi. But then he acknowleged that SAKRWAR and SIKRWAR are the same and allowed my citing on Fatehpur-Sikri page. And because I was new I couldn't track and reply them initially about my concerns. So Indeed you right to judge me and block me. Indeed I may have ended up giving circular reference and I apologies. I will work on it discuss it separately (Kshatriya, Brihadbala). A blog spot is not accepted as a source, I came to know about it only after the "Jamuhar" page incident. Shashank Shubham (talk) 09:28, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To post the cover page / publisher info page of the book, can you suggest any image sharing website or is INSTAGRAM fine because I am not on Facebook? Yes I too searched those ISBN on Bloomsbury's website and when I didn't find it, I called them to confirm but nobody picked up the call. So I have send a request to confirm my request to verify my claims because It strangely why a book details is not in public domain or within reach of any Book-Seller and why Amazon has no details about it and why I can't review that book. Sorry for the spelling mistake but Author name is Pawan BakHshi with extra "H" in it.Shashank Shubham (talk) 09:39, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You used the book to cite Rajgarh,_Alwar that Mathandeva's inscription but the word "Badgurjara" word was already written there. The book doesn't mention Badgujara is in the inscription but it says that the word "Kushlo" is not acknowledged in the interpretation and that Badgujar used to live there and collected tax from Meena Tribe and with the rise of Pratihara they become vassal to them.Shashank Shubham (talk) 09:47, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

October 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bargujar. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]