User talk:Sharon.boudreaux

License tagging for File:SharonBoudreaux.png

Thanks for uploading File:SharonBoudreaux.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Patrick Henry High School (Stockbridge, Georgia) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 20:15, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KylieTastic

Hello, I'm Sharon Boudreaux.

If like to understand how actual, direct data about the physical structure and their purposes, on any given physical location, as recorded from a first-person report who lived the exact history discussed on that section of that page, isn't " because they did not appear constructive? "

Any clarity you can provide as to why lived history and direct, first-hand knowledge, purposely written in the third-person objective for easier understand by ESL+ users, somehow, frowned upon for addition to our exceedingly wonderful, shared global knowledge base?

Seriously - not angry, snarking, pitchin' stones, or any other perceived negativity. - I truly, genuinely want to understand. (broadly) this position and (regarding today's particular) your decision.

Much obliged,

~ Sharon Sharon.boudreaux (talk) 20:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, what first got flagged that drew my attention was the invalid logo Stockbridge Tigers but when I checked the caption "'Eye of the Tiger,' an earworm 4U! 🤭" looked to be joke. Then also the "RESEARCH DATA from ‽HWWWWW‽ ↓↓↓" looked to be just random junk posting. The fact that you have responded shows you were not likely to be be deliberately being un-constructive so consider the warning struck. Do note that we do not have information based on "first-person reports" or "first-hand knowledge" and that all information should be sources with independent reliable sources - see Help:Referencing for beginners. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 21:06, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]