User talk:Shantanu Bhardwaj.

Welcome

Hello, Shantanu Bhardwaj., and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Shantanu Bhardwaj., good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 21:16, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --2409:4062:209A:1703:E810:F979:D767:27D5 (talk) 21:54, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --2409:4062:209A:1703:E810:F979:D767:27D5 (talk) 21:57, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I want to discussed on my page. Shantanu Bhardwaj. (talk) 22:09, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:02, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry

Please see Shantanu S Bhardwaj (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) Please see WP:SOCK - --Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 18:25, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS

https://utrs-beta.wmflabs.org/appeal/30699 is now closed. Response carried over:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. You have been blocked for self promotion. To be unblocked, please agree to not attempt to write about yourself. Please tell us what constructive edits you would make. You placed promotional material on your user page. User pages are to help editors function as editors of Wikipedia. Not self promotion. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:User_pages#What may I not have in my user pages? As you still have access to your talk page, and as there is no private information associated with your appeal, please post your unblock request to your user talk page for administrator review. Place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "
 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Thank you for your attention to these matters.

--Deep fried okra (schalte ein) 18:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shantanu Bhardwaj. (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

your reason goes here Shantanu Bhardwaj. (talk) 18:36, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Once again, read WP:GAB to understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. If you are unable to do so, we'll have to remove your access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 19:58, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Shantanu Bhardwaj., where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:57, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]