User talk:Shantanu2806

Welcome!

Hello, Shantanu2806, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Pahari Sahib 09:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Sarfaraz Khan VMH GOI.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sarfaraz Khan VMH GOI.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 20:24, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: History of Bengal

Thanks for your note on my talk page :-) You seem to have got off to a fine start, just a couple of minor things, if your want to mark a page as under construction, then just add {{Under Construction}} - like has been done here. Also you can just type ~~~~ to sign your name (you can amend how it displays by going into my preferences and editing the signature bit as desired. Pahari Sahib 16:15, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Murshid Quli Khan.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Murshid Quli Khan.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Polly (Parrot) 00:09, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Katra Masjid Dome Destroyed.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Katra Masjid Dome Destroyed.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 14:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Katra Masjid Mosque.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Katra Masjid Mosque.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Polly (Parrot) 14:13, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:54, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Regards, Shantanu 16:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Continental Airlines, you will be blocked from editing. -MBK₀₀₄ 08:25, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gentleman,

Whatever has been stated is a fact. Please Check the internet.Just because you are an American does not give the the right to police everything. I am reporting your threat in this matter. You are pitting a Commercial Airline to a dignitary like A.P.J. Abdul Kalam??. How DARE you use the word VANDALIZE. What has been stated is a FACT.

--shantanu2806 06:41, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

I have added back the bit about Dr. Abdul Kalam, it is a fact and has happened and also has caused a great deal of umbrage in India and so merits mention. Also I don't see how Shantanu's edit was a) vandalism b) being disruptive. Pahari Sahib 10:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That wasnt any vandalism. As an admin, User:MBK004 should have first verified it on atleast google, before giving a irresponsible warning like above -- Tinu Cherian - 05:14, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have done this already. Is the same not working? --shantanu2806 07:19, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Panipat

Why are you deleting File:The Third battle of Panipat 13 January 1761.jpg from the Battle of Panipat (1761) article? I also note that you have been reverting on the article without discussion, though I also note that you have tried initiating discussion and I commend you for that. Wikipedia runs on consensus and a consensus needs to be agreed about the image. Regards, Woody (talk) 19:45, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Talk:Battle_of_Panipat_(1761)#Infobox_image. I am interested in your reasoning because as far as I can see, it is not based on any policy or guideline. Thanks, Woody (talk) 19:58, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK friend. Save the picture on your computer. Magnify it. See the left margin of the picture...come to the middle.... the camp of the Maratthas. You will find an / a few afghan soldiers ravishing ladies of the Marattha camp. Hindus and especially Maratthas will find this seriously offensive.... so will any sensible person. I do not know how many people have noticed this. I noticed this a few years ago when a copy of this painting was displayed in India and immediately taken off.

Though this is a work of art... there may be a posibility of it being excessive or partisan in nature. Is the reasoning good enough? If not...please excuse my action.This is a free (civilized??) form of sharing information after all.Thanks --Shantanu2806 (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Woody You have not responded... --Shantanu2806 (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not responding, I do not have your page watched, though I do watch the Panipat page. I have responded on the talkpage, it is best to keep the discussion their where everyone can see it and discuss it. Woody (talk) 18:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Giria

Hello :-)

I came across your article on the Battle of Giria, a couple of things, as there were two battles there should be two articles. I would suggest Battle of Giria (1740) and Battle of Giria (1763) or First Battle of Giria and Second Battle of Giria. Also I created an article on the village. Pahari Sahib 12:14, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Banglapedia

Hello,

Don't know if you seen but following of from your query about Banglapedia, I queried it, see response here and it can still be used as a ref. Pahari Sahib 07:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Plassey Monument.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Plassey Monument.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 22:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 22:12, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Shantanu2806. You have new messages at Ww2censor's talk page.
Message added 16:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

ww2censor (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi Shantanu2806,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]