User talk:Shannon1488

Welcome!

Hello, Shannon1488, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Car Tick 22:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This comment tell me that you have to educate yourself with wikipedia policies (mentioned above) and try to understand what WP:NPOV is. --Car Tick 22:10, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're being discussed by administrators

You've been mentioned at WP:ANI#POV tag in Nair article. You are invited to respond there. EdJohnston (talk) 14:25, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please refer to WP:NOTCENSORED. --Car Tick 17:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

In case u did not notice. --CarTick (talk) 16:46, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anandks007

What "double meaning words" did I use referring to him? As I recall, you complained that I was attacking him when I said that we're all sensitive about POV-pushing since it's so hugely prevalent on WP caste articles. I completely honestly fail to see what you're finding so objectionable at Nair. It does clearly state that they served in the military, it clearly states they filled a high societal role, following the Brahmins. What exactly is so upsetting about Nair? What is so poorly referenced? What is so poorly organised, other than the parts that Sitush hasn't had much chance to work on? MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for being abusive to other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 03:11, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The edit summary you just used at Nair was completely unacceptable - if you repeat anything like that again after your block expires, you should expect to be blocked for longer, possibly indefinitely -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 03:12, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kshatriya Communities

Look, you have just come off a block. If you keep on warring at Template:Kshatriya Communities then I can see you being blocked again, and this time it is likely to be for longer. Why do this? You have had ample opportunity to provide evidence for your assertion of kshatriya status and have singularly failed to do so. It might interest you to know that exactly the same problem is facing Rajkris on another article, which involves some people on the "they are not" side who are have had no involvement in the Nair article. In that instance, it looks likely that the whole article will be scrapped but everyone is prepared to let Rajkris come up with something more if he can find it. This is how it should work, and he has agreed with that.

There is a world of difference between someone "claiming" to be kshatriya and a mountain of academic evidence that they were not.

Please revert your recent edit to the template. Take it back to the talk page at Nair and try to resolve things there. Once (if) you prove your point then the template can be revised. Until you prove it, there is a contradiction in place and this is not good for anyone. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 02:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:31, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Once your block is lifted, if you wish to make any edits that are clearly contested, you must discuss them on the Talk page rather than edit-warring -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:33, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Some help over Nair regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:46, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I realise you cannot comment at WP:ANI while you are blocked - but if you wish to make any comments, please do so here and I or someone else will copy them across for you -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 21:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Your name was mentioned here by Sitush. He was talking something about Metapedia. Take a look at the comment. Axxn (talk) 09:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 07:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cupcake for you!

Yo MangoWong ^ℳ 07:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]