User talk:ShanksofWessex

April 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.

. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:48, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ShanksofWessex, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ShanksofWessex! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you upload a media file with false or missing copyright or source information, as you did at Julie Anne San Jose. -WayKurat (talk) 02:33, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikipedia requires evidence of copyright: we can't simply accept the unsubstantiated say-so of someone who comes to Wikipedia and claims to hold the copyright, as people can (and do) come here and make false claims, whether as deliberate lies or as misunderstanding of copyright law. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ShanksofWessex. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]