User talk:Shanghai killer whale

Username concern

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and I am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy for the following reason: Use of "killer" refers to an act of real-world violence. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:

If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Wikipedia administrators usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Wikipedia:Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 15:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The username is not a big deal to me tbh. I picked it because it was the first random thing that came to my head. I can't really be bothered to justify my reason for choosing it so I'll put in a name change request now.

Cheers Shanghai killer (talk) 09:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Photo 69.jpg

File:Photo 69.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Photo 69.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Photo 69.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:14, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo 68.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Yeo's Chrysanthemum Tea.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:17, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Box of Yeo's Chrysanthemum Tea.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Box of Yeo's Chrysanthemum Tea.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 21:59, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Shanghai killer whale, wikipedian.jpg

The file File:Shanghai killer whale, wikipedian.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:50, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]