Thanks for catching my browser bug on that revert. Normally I check to make sure the end is still there, but I forgot this time. I'll see if I can exorcise the bug so the potential problem stops coming up. Thanks, William Pietri14:48, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I DEMAND his immediate ban. He just reverted my work in List of Batman: The Animated Series episodes in its entirety, with complete disregard for naming conventions, and a complete disregard of my edits for consistency of "Part One" and "Part I" (he of course being all over the map on this). DOES HE GET TO OWN THIS PAGE? If so, then Wikipedia is a pathetic excuse for a resourse. I HAVE HAD IT WITH THIS BOOR. He is a complete waste of everyone's time. Why do we put up with this??? And how long does he get to defame me with impunity on his talk page? I DEMAND that all mentions of my by him be deleted NOW!!!! -- Dyslexic agnostic07:31, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I know you're gone right now, but I still wanted to leave this message before I forget again. Your kind welcome on my talk page really gave me a good start on Wikipedia (plus, the links were really helpful). Thanks a million! <3 --Alex16:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for supporting my recent RfA, Ms. Shanel!
To the people who have supported my request: I appreciate the show of confidence in me and I hope I live up to your expectations! To the people who opposed the request: I'm certainly not ignoring the constructive criticism and advice you've offered. I thank you as well! ♥! ~Kylu (u|t)07:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
When you get back from wikibreak, make sure you poke me in that one channel. You're owed hugs. ~Kylu (u|t) 07:27, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, if you are on IRC sometime, can you grant me access back in the channel? I accidentally unlinked myself losing my access rights :(--KungfuAdam(talk)22:02, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Repeated vandalism by at least one anonymous user.
I need to contact you as soon as possible regarding some press inquiries. If you can contact me via e-mail, irc, or any other means you can come up with I'd really appreciate it. Or call the office in Florida [+1 727 231 0101], and they can get you in touch with me. - Amgine22:13, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Taken care of. Incidentally, it was rather silly to post this here — Shanel won't see it for some time, by which the problem would most likely have been resolved (as it has been).--SB | T06:42, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have been told that you are one of the various corporate executives that one can sleep with to gain access to #wikipedia-en-admins. Joking aside, could you add me to the list? My freenode registered nick is the same as my username, WAvegetarian.—WAvegetarian•(talk)23:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I just wanted to say thanks for jumping on the speedy so quickly for that article. I figured that something that defamatory should have a source and I didn't see anything about it on a web search. I also removed a reference to it from Lukas Rossi. Is it appropriate to warn the user who posted this, or welcome them and include a note about sourcing statements, or is it just best to leave it alone? Regards --Brian G (Talk) 03:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for catching and reversing the anonymous blanking of my user and talk pages; I happened to be away for a few days, and it's always nice to know the community is there. -- JHunterJ12:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You're also listed as a coach for Tdxiang. Pretty well the same thing applies as above, except an additional bullet point would read 'If the coaching is now active, please move the entry up to the active section of the box', or something like that :) Petros47115:12, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding your message here, please inform as to how I need to obtain whatever permission is necessary to host those pictures, and if not on Wikisource or Wikicommons, if another part of Wiki is eligible. The Jamestown Foundation has entrusted me with creating a Wiki(-somewhere) page displaying jpegs of the Getman collection, and needless to say it'd be a wash without any pictures!--Mike18xx05:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. I am new to IRC. I can get on #wikipedia and #wikipedia-en with no problem, but when I go to #wikipedia-en-admins, it says "you need to be invited", so I type "/msg chanserv invite #wikipedia-en-admins", which it replies with "your nickname is not registered". The help says that the syntax for registering is "REGISTER <password>". Typing REISTER and my desired password brings no result. Is there a password for this that I need to get from you, or is my syntax wrong, or what? Thanks! Herostratus04:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It really was a really, really, REALLY gay article. That's a fact, man, not my opinion. The article was copied and pasted from an ad or PR article or some shit, therefore I deleted it and simply noted that it was a really, really, REALLY gay article.
You need to look at the world a little differently. Listen to "Do Re Mi" by Nirvana and get back to me.
Ok got it. The "bot" has been blocked on the Commons anyways now for the next 24 hours, let's just hope it won't "warn" users again :-) Gryffindor00:56, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I just learned that there is such channel (#wikipedia-en-admins), is it possible for me to have access to it? Many thanks. My IRC username is also Winhunter. --WinHunter(talk)14:45, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Don't you have classes on occasion... I've been watching the AVB revert log to block WoW but you always beat me :) -- Tawker18:50, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well... it seems that lately maybe you might feel like one of the chemicals inside this plant, pushed around from place to place and not sure what is being done to you when, but hang in there. Your college experience will get better, trust me. ++Lar: t/c19:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good morning. You have been involved in the periodic blocking of this IP. See block log. If I'm counting correctly, this IP has been blocked 26 times before (after eliminating the temporary unblocks and reblocks). I gather from your temporary unblocks that you sometimes edit from this IP. Given the pattern of vandalism and the recurrence despite repeated warnings, I have put an extended block on this IP. I believe that I have put the block on using the new "anon-only" feature so hopefully it will have no impact on you or other signed in users. And of course, all the anons can still read the encyclopedia in order to do their needed research. Please let me know if there are any unintended consequences of this block. Thanks. Rossami(talk)15:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The attacks on the FHFIF character pages never end.
Vandalism continues hitting it/them. I am reporting this guy without mercy because I am not in a pleasant mood. There was recent vandalism on the same page that slanders Bloo, though the vandalism was commited by another user (or at least from a very different IP). --Juigi Kario (Charge! * My crusades) 01:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I got #wikipedia-en-admins to recognize me (I think), but entering "/msg chanserv invite #wikipedia-en-admins" returns the message "An access level of [5] is required for [INVITE] on #wikipedia-en-admins" from ChanServ. So how do I set my access level to 5? thx Herostratus05:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Someone with channel ops does that level set for you. I can do it for Herostratus, assuming he's an admin (which he is), if no one else is around but not till tonite. ++Lar: t/c16:10, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It has been suggested that, since you are a Wikipedian in Good Standing and able to keep your cool when the editing gets hot, that you would be a welcome addition to the WP:OTRS team. Please take a look at m:Info-en_guide for an idea of what's involved, and email me a note. I'll get you set up and you'll be ready to brave the mosquito-infested fens of OTRS. The Uninvited Co., Inc.21:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Shanel,
I've moved the old Wiktionary sockpuppet account formerly known as Shanel to another name, as you requested. Please come on over, create your account, edit, and let me know if you have any questions about anything, since we do have a few Wiktionary-specific conventions. — Dvortygirl05:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC) (Wiktionary bureaucrat)[reply]
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar (formerly the Anti-Vandalism Barnstar) may be awarded to those who show great contributions to protecting and reverting attacks of vandalism on Wikipedia. In your conduct, I hereby award you this award. --Catout17:31, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You reverted my edit to Hale (lunar crater) where I deleted random stuff about the Nazis that for some reason was in an article about a crater. I don't see what the Nazis have to do with a lunar crater and I'm certainly not a vandal so please revert the article to my version.
Hi, and thanks for offering to help with the Wikipedia Weekly podcast. Episode 2 will soon be recorded and release, and so we've started planning for Episode 3, to be recorded next Friday. If you'd like to be on the panel, or suggest any content for the show, feel free to edit that page with the details. Don't feel limited to the five places on the panel, either - there are two extra places available for alternate hosts, who would fill in if the others are unable to speak.
Hey Shanel, thanks a lot for supporting me in my recent RfA. It succeeded, and I am very grateful to all of you. If you ever need help with anything, please don't hesitate to ask. Also, feel free point out any mistakes I make! Thanks again, —Khoikhoi04:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Shanel,
I wish you a very happy Diwali! May you enjoy yourself on this day commemorating good over evil. Cheers! --May the Force be with you! Shreshth9112:32, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Happy Diwali (or Deepavali as we call it here in Singapore)! Hope you enjoy your weekend, and let the good overcome the evil. So how do you celebrate Diwali in Canada (if I'm not wrong)? :D --Terence Ong(T | C)13:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. It is perhaps my first message to you. Nice meeting you. I wish you All The Best on the ocasion of the Indian festival of light, Diwali. I am sure that the light of hope, confidence, and all positive attributes shall always remain inside you – lighting your path and guiding you to attain higher and higher levels of excellence in all your endevours! All the best! --Bhadani15:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are receiving this message because you are currently listed as a coach in the 'Pending' section of the coaching box.
If the coaching has started and is ongoing please move the entry to the 'active' section of the box'.
If the coaching has finished/never going to start please add your trainee to the archived requests section of the archive, and remove the entry from the coaching box.
You can fill in information about your former students, at the main archive.
If the coaching is ongoing please continue :) This might serve as a useful reminder to check with your trainee if they have any new questions!
If you are ready to be assigned a new trainee, or have any other questions, please let me know on my talk page.
To get an idea of why H.D. is so pissed at Mattisse, take a look at this user conduct RfC] I've started on Mattisse. While I don't condone the nasty personal attack, Mattisse has a serious reality check coming, IMO. What I've got so far is probably less than half of it. -999 (Talk) 23:28, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I would have beaten Bearly (I'm having a private "race" with him that only I know about. Well, i guess you do, too, now.) But I was using a Blackberry and couldn't get on this page. Oh, well. Have a splendid one. Randfan01:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I, Glen give you Shanel this delicious traditional KiwiPavlova because its your BIRTHDAY!!! So, you're now, like... 15?? ....Kidding! Happy birthday babe!
I wish you a very merry Thanksgiving! Hope you and your family have a magnificent day! So, what are you thankful for? Hooray and happy gormandiziŋ! --Randfanpleasetalktalk to me!
Have a great day! Please respond on my talk page (the red "fan" link in my signature). Cheers! :) —Randfan!!
Cheers! :) —Randfan!! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Hi, I noticed you blocked User:Pynopoulous. He posted sort of an odd question on the refdesk, but you said he was a sockpuppet of a banned user..which user do you mean? --WootyWoot?contribs08:30, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
You are down as a member of the WikiProject on user warning layout standardisation. I and a number of editors for the last couple of months have been working on the harmonisation of the current warning message templates, at WP:UW. I have spoken to a couple of other members of your project, and I would like to merge it and it's talk pages with ours. If you still have interest in the project or would like to participate or have any thoughts on the combined projects please let me know. Any other problems don't hesitate to give me a shout. Regards Khukri(talk . contribs)10:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for restoring some faith in myself, I had started to wonder. And if you'd like to look after this tree for a bit, it's had a rough upbringing and could use a good home over Christmas, I'm sure it'll behave itself, I've been training it myself ;) --Alfmelmac19:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And since I don't know which you celebrate, I hope you have/had/will have a very happy Holiday!. Hope you and your family have a magnificent day, or series of days!You might wanna install the "SaucyMillionaire" font to see this correctly. Cheers, mate!:) —Randfan!!
Would you support the concept of moving the Earhart "myths" to a separate page or article? The reason for my suggesting this is that the main article should be an accurate and scholarly work while the speculation and conspiracy theories surrounding the disappearance of Amelia Earhart are interesting, they belong in a unique section. Most researchers, as you know, discount the many theories and speculation that has arisen in the years following her last flight. Go onto the Earhart discussion page and register your vote/comments...and a Happy New Year to you as well. Bzuk 05:02 3 January 2007 (UTC).
I am an administrator and would appreciate it if you would allow me, Cbrown1023_, access to the #wikipedia-en-admins IRC channel. Thank you, Cbrown102318:29, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was told by the Contact Wikipedia page that one was to either e-mail the administrator who blocked them or contact them on their talk page.
While I do not have an IRC channel, I figured contacting here would be the best way. I am the user currently in charge of the IP address 4.249.108.83, which you blocked. I'm not sure why it was blocked, as I've only used Wikipedia to read entries. The only entry I ever edited was one on Air Force One, and that was to change a mistake of the location of Andrews Air Force Base. As for that edit, it is because I live near the base myself and know the area well. If this is the reason for my banning, then I would say you're two years behind schedule.
I haven't hurt anyone, and I'm not around the Internet nearly enough to edit any pages, so giving myself my own login wouldn't be necessary.
I would appreciate if someone resolved the matter of my blocking, please.
You might want to keep an eye on this article that you stubbed per an OTRS complaint. Someone is trying to rebuild it using Wikipedia diffs as a source. I've removed the unsourced material twice already, but it's likely to be reinserted. Frise23:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You have to learn to speak for yourself. I entered the information on the Iona Prep football team. I am an alumnus of the school and am an historian on the school's football team. None of the information that I entered was copied from the Iona Prep Web site. If you go to the web site, you will not see any historical data on the Iona Prep football team.
Wikipedia has too many editors who don't know what they're doing.
Hi Shanel, it's been a while, I hope you're OK! Someone made an interesting suggestion at WP:COUNCIL recently which sounds like it would be a good new direction for WP:WVWP. Could you take a look at the suggestion and give us your thoughts? Thanks, and all the best for 2007. Oh, by the way, we are beta testing the WP:V0.5 CD release, it looks nice, should be out very soon! Cheers, Walkerma04:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that you've listed yourself as a member who's interested in copy-editing. I'm a member of the League of Copyeditors, a project dedicated to managing the sizable backlog of articles needing a copy-edit. We're always looking for new members, and you'd make a great addition to the project! We've started a participation drive for the remainder of February. If you're interested, you can help clear the backlog by adopting the following goals each week:
Select an article to copy-edit from the backlog. After your copy-edit, list the article in the ready for final proofread section.
I was just finishing with the DYK update, doing the credits after update — in between that and clearing the page, you added two new entries created by User:KNM. I noted that these were actually expired nominations (from 24 February). I don't go back to things on the expired list when I update, but I have no objections to you returning them to the next update page.
I'm going offline now. (I should have stopped editing 2 hours ago, but I didn't want to see DYK backlogged.)
Back for a moment... see you didn't get a chance to see this note. I returned the two nominations as I did not intend to revert your choices. — ERcheck (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The entry you added to the update page for DYK is not new enough according to the history of both the episode and the season articles. I also couldn't find significant expansion beyond stub status to warrant inclusion. Did I miss something or did you make a mistake? (Please answer on my talk page) - Mgm|(talk)13:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your name is still listed at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Volunteers. The department is heavily backlogged with student's requests for coaches, and we need your help!
Note that the instructions may have changed since the last time you checked, and the department now follows a self-help process...
If you don't currently have a student, or if you believe you can handle another one, please select a student from the request list at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests and contact them. See the instructions on Wikipedia:Admin coaching. Good luck.
If you are no longer available to coach, , please remove yourself from the volunteers list.
Hi, please let us stop this foolishness. The article is in regards to a business model in the UK, it must be worded with the same legal terms it was formed on, by the Companies House. It is not CR infrngmnt, it is clearly fair use as it depicts what the law has stated. Thanks. frummer19:02, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't agree with this delete at all, there is clearly no consensus and if the event is notable, the key people in it are, you can not separate the two. I assume good faith on your part and don't question your motives, but I do disagree with the delete, which did take four afds to get to. Anyway, that's just my opinion.Rlevse17:00, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the blatant spam, but you have yourself down as interested at WikiProject user warnings WP:UW. There is a discussion on going here that might be of interest to you about the future of this project. There are two strawpolls on the talk pages and the second one is about the future of the WP:UW project. Now we have the end in sight we are looking at wrapping up the project and merging it with Template messages/User talk namespace WP:UTM and creating a one stop shop for all userspace templates. As you have yourself down as interested in this project we thought you may have some input on this issue, and would like you to visit the discussion and give any thoughts you may have on the matter. Cheers Khukri10:34, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See her user page, where her photograph shows a female and her flags show her to be a Trinidadian Indian Canadian Pathoschildian. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 05:56:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
Understood then. I just find page-move "vandalism" irritating since it creates redlinks on my watchlist that I then have to remove. Have a nice and frivolous day! --tjstrftalk05:19, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have been trying to present an alternative view regarding Diem's treatment of Buddhists that is supported by several historians. Another user keeps deleting it. After the last deletion, you stepped in and protected the page, preventing me from responding until April 10. I have looked back over the last 500 entries for this article, and I don't find any contributions from you, so I'm wondering: Why did you choose to block further edits?
--VnTruth17:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Luna-san told me to contact you and request access, but he did it right before my bedtime. I use the nick dgies. What should I do? I'm not a total IRC noob, but am unfamiliar with things like restricted channels and I barely understand a nickserv. —dgiestc04:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted the bulk of the Tony Eveready article. This happened a few weeks ago, by Ryulong. I explained to him why the article was valid as it was, and he restored it. Now you have removed it again. This is getting ridiculous. The following is what I wrote to him. Also, if you still don't think you should revert the article to its original form, then please discuss that with Ryulong.
So you deleted most of this article because it was original research. I disagree with this because most of the information that was deleted is factual information. Here are some examples:
The entire section labeled The "Booyah" Video is all factual. It is a brief synopsis of one of Eveready's most famous films. Would this not count as original research if there was a citation to the video at the end of this section?
The section labeled Eveready's Technique merely explains the derivation and common use of a phrase that was invented largely due to the man that the article is about. This is both relevant and factual.
The section labeled Internet Meme and Beyond is very true. If you looks at popular internet sites that college students share information on, such as Facebook.com and Myspace.com, you will find that many students have joined groups that are based on Tony Eveready. Some examples are the groups "Dig tuh china then tone!", "Freak dat bitch out den tone!" and "Awww Tone." If these sources are cited, will this no longer be original research?
My most important point is that the parts of this article that were deleted are very similar to parts of other articles that are allowed to remain. My main example is the article about the recent film "Snakes on a Plane." The Snakes on a plane article has a section that is a synopsis of the movie, and a section entitled "Internet" which explains the online following that this movie developed. These are basically the same as the Tony Eveready article sections that were deleted. The Snakes on a Plane article even has a section about References in Popular Culture, which is also quite similar to the Internet Meme and Beyond section of the TOny Eveready article.
It seems to me like there is some kind of double standard here, and that you are being overly critical of the Tony Eveready article possibly for personal reasons (ie. you don't like the pornography industry). Are you still sure that you can delete the bulk of this article while leaving so many other articles that have the same 'violation' intact?
Greetings from the Opera Project which you contacted at the beginning of last year. I have now joined the Editorial Team so I can help if necessary. We have been having some issues with the bots operated by the Biography Project, their machine assessments and resulting editing, so I thought it might be helpful to open up direct communication with you. Thanks and best wishes. --Kleinzach03:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
