User talk:Shanejumpinj11

I edit classic rock pages

Shanejumpinj11, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shanejumpinj11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Your recent editing history at Aftermath (Rolling Stones album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. isento (talk) 18:00, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

The other rankings from subsequent publications of this same list are ancillary details in the big picture that is the Rankings section. Introducing them directly in the text inhibits the read and flow of the paragraph. They are better off in a footnote. isento (talk) 18:04, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Here is the guideline: Explanatory or content notes are used to add explanations, comments or other additional information relating to the main content but would make the text too long or awkward to read. I believe mentioning rankings from 2012 and 2020, before going back to a ranking from 2008, is awkward. I also believe it places a long and undue emphasis on the Rolling Stone 500 list, which distracts from the focus of the paragraph (WP:UNDUE, WP:OFFTOPIC). Which leads me to conclude that allocating those other rankings into a footnote is the best approach. isento (talk) 18:13, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)