User talk:ShaneKWatson

Welcome!

Hello, ShaneKWatson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like James Kavanaugh Priest and Poet, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sgroupace (talk) 03:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of James Kavanaugh Priest and Poet

The article James Kavanaugh Priest and Poet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notabilty

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sgroupace (talk) 03:40, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Status and Advice

What you wrote was not really suitable--this is not the place for original work-- our articles have to be based on sources published elsewhere. But since I know he is famous, as reviewing administrator, I rewrote the article. There are a few places where exact references are still needed; they are marked, & it would help if you could fill them in. We need exact dates of publication & if possible a link to the online version. DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]