User talk:Xszcw
Just Want to Know
[edit]In what grounds did you stated in your edit summary that my output was vandalism. Would you mind defining what vandalism is. I hope you could support your edit summary, reverting one thing and saying that it is vandalism. Shoowak (talk) 19:48, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
- Your edit seems to be self-promotion. All other external links at the end of that page are in context but yours appear to be spam.Shane (talk) 09:36, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Then define spam. And please address the vandalism issue. Both of us are editing for more than a year, and you should have known what a vandalism is. Shoowak (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I give up, you win. Have your link. Someone else will sort it out. Have a nice day :) Shane (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- You misunderstood me. I am putting the link there NO MORE. I know when to give up, too. I have realized my fault. What I want to tell you is that do not just put in your edit summary a 'vandalism action' because someone had made a mistake in editing. Well, have a nice day too. Shoowak (talk) 17:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- That is very responsible of you. If you want, you can tell me how to remove that vandalism report and I will do so. Thankyou for being reasonable.Shane (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- You misunderstood me. I am putting the link there NO MORE. I know when to give up, too. I have realized my fault. What I want to tell you is that do not just put in your edit summary a 'vandalism action' because someone had made a mistake in editing. Well, have a nice day too. Shoowak (talk) 17:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, I give up, you win. Have your link. Someone else will sort it out. Have a nice day :) Shane (talk) 17:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Then define spam. And please address the vandalism issue. Both of us are editing for more than a year, and you should have known what a vandalism is. Shoowak (talk) 14:18, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
(Reset Indent) An edit summary could not be edited. Thank you also for handling this issue with a cool head. Kudos to you. Shoowak (talk) 17:37, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)