User talk:Shaminda Attygalle

Your submission at Articles for creation: Axonify (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Axonify and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Axonify concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Axonify, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored Draft:Axonify per your request. It was declined as an article in the past due to concerns that it seemed too much like advertising. Happy editing. Karl Dickman ^talk 05:39, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Axonify

Hello, Shaminda Attygalle,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Axonify should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axonify .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, scope_creep 17:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)