User talk:Shaliq

Kim Collins Questions

Hello. You have a new message at LongLiveMusic's talk page.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shaliq (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. I get the following message upon trying to edit my first-ever page - Karin Okolie: Editing from 209.95.32.0/19 has been blocked (disabled) by Elockid for the following reason: Server-multiple.svg The IP address that you're currently using has been blocked because it's believed to be a web host provider. You will not be able to edit Wikipedia using a web host provider. I do not believe that I'm using a web host, so I'd like to kindly appeal this block. It says that my block has been set to expire: 15:42, 18 January 2017. This was my 1st ever page. I'd like to kindly ask for the ban to be lifted.Shaliq (talk) 14:43, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but the block on the range is clearly valid; it's an obvious web host and one that been used abusively. In fact, the edits from this range have been so problematic that there's another global block on the range indicating there are open proxies operating there. Do you have some other way to connect to the internet? Kuru (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: Shaliq has contacted me through email regarding the block. The IP is registered to WestHost. Elockid ^(Talk) 19:23, 19 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Kim-Collins 03.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Kim-Collins 03.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 00:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]