User talk:Shakib ul hassan

Welcome!

Hi Shakib ul hassan! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion of Battle of Thane

Nomination of Battle of Thane for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Thane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Thane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Imperial ^[AFCND] 15:41, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, thanks for concerning Shakib ul hassan (talk) 09:22, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saka-Satavahana Wars

Hy @Shakib ul hassan, You Are Continously Vandalising the Article of Saka-Satavahana Wars, As stated in the Source Sakas were victorious in the Final War that caused Decline of Satavahana Kingdom DeepstoneV (talk) 09:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not for the final victory, with adding 'Saka victory' the article becomes contradicting. As the last phase of the war (mentioned in the article itself) mentions the reconquest of the lost regions in the 3rd phase of the war. If you want to add 'Saka Victory', then provide a better source for either adding a another phase or the defeat of Satvahanas in the last phase. Shakib ul hassan (talk) 12:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chola invasion of Kalinga (1110), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalinga. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Shakib ul hassan. Thank you for your work on Maratha–Patiala Clashes. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Izno (talk) 22:27, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Singha Purohit for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Singha Purohit is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Singha Purohit until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Imperial ^[AFCND] 18:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Chandragupta II's Campaign of Balkh

Hello Shakib ul hassan, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Chandragupta II's Campaign of Balkh, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandragupta II's Campaign of Balkh.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shakib ul hassan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I’m writing to request that my account, @Shakib ul hassan:, be unbanned. I fully accepts the past mistakes that led to my block, particularly the creation of multiple sock puppet accounts (@Androkottus:, @Imaan quadri:, @ImanAli45:, @Imanali45:, @Manik69:, @ManikSharma8969:, @RagedBrahmin:, @Sandrokottus:, @गांधार नरेश:) which violated Wikipedia’s guidelines. I understand the harm this caused to the community. I have now waited for six months, using this time to reflect on my actions and their results. I truly recognize the value of proper conduct on the platform, and I am committed to contributing effectively from this moment. I am applying for reconsideration under WP:SO, and I humbly ask for a second chance. My intention is to move ahead with a fresh and responsible approach, adhering strictly to Wikipedia’s guidelines and becoming a positive contributor. I appreciate your time and understanding. Regards.

Decline reason:

Sandrokottus last edited in August, 2024. That's not the six months you falsely claimed. This unblock request will count against you in any future unblock request and resets the timer. Six months from now is 2025-04-21 and that assumes zero further block evasion. Yamla (talk) 19:08, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.