User talk:Shakespeareanpie

Hello, Shakespeareanpie, and welcome to Wikipedia. Here are some pages that you will help you to find your way around, understand policies and guidelines, and develop your contributions:
Finding your way	Editing pages	Policies and guidelines
Frequently Asked Questions Department Directory Community Portal Editor's Index	How to edit a page Tutorial How to develop an article Manual of Style	The Five Pillars of Wikipedia Index of Policies Index of Guidelines Resolving disputes
Please sign your name whenever you leave a comment by using four tildes (~~~~), which produces your name and the date. Whenever you edit a page, even if the edit is minor, please include a descriptive edit summary. If you need help, please read Wikipedia:Questions or place `{{helpme}}` on your talk page and someone will respond shortly. You may also be interested in Wikipedia's adopt-a-user scheme. I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia and find it a rewarding experience. - Adrian M. H. 20:43, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Editing an article that has been tagged with an information box

{{helpme}} I have been editing this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITransact

It was tagged with an information box that says "This article or section is written like an advertisement. Please help rewrite this article from a neutral point of view per Wikipedia policy." I spent many hours when composing the article to make it conform with Wikipedia style, and have now gone back through it and changed/removed verbiage that may have been interpreted as being too much like ad copy. How do I now have it reviewed for removal of the information box? If it still doesn't pass muster, can someone point me to the specific areas that are viewed as having a non-neutral POV?

Thank you! Shakespeareanpie 16:04, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you can do is ask other users who are regular contributers of the article to have a look on the article talk page and if others a satisfied that its clean from spam then you can safely remove the notice. Regards — The Sunshine Man 16:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Thank you, Sunshine Man. I am the only contributor to the article, however, so I don't know who the "others" would be. Shakespeareanpie 16:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at the article, and I don't think it's reads like an ad. Additionally, because 67.98.183.129 didn't provide any reasons for tagging it, I think that you can remove the notice.--Werdan7^{T @} 16:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Werdan7! Shakespeareanpie 17:01, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ITransact for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITransact is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITransact until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 14:42, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]