User talk:Shakeitcecerocky

Hannah Montana (Season 4)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Hannah Montana (Season 4), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Hannah Montana (season 4). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hannah Montana (season 3). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of Sonny With A Chance Episodes

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of Sonny With A Chance Episodes, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of Sonny with a Chance episodes. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop creating duplicates of existing pages AussieLegend (talk) 22:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Sonny with a Chance (Season 2). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Chzz ► 22:03, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Template talk:Disney Channel Original Series, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 22:27, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Vera Duckworth. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (talk) 22:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Fish Hooks : The Search Of The Golden Oscar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Fish Hooks : The Search Of The Golden Oscar. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Phineas and Ferb: Across the Second Dimension - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 13:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article It's a Laugh Productions, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 22:21, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Your edits made to Shake It Up! are incorrect as R. Brandon Johnson and Caroline Sunshine are not a part of the main cast. Also do not add speculation to articles, such as Deuce Martinez becoming recurring. Thanks.Candy o32 17:52, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Kyle Massey has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 18:14, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The X Factor (UK series 7). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Anemone Projectors 18:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to East Street (Children in Need). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to a loss of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. 5 albert square (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Samantha & Haylie

The article Samantha & Haylie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems a hoax, no sources found. If not hoax, then wp:CRYSTAL applies

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yoenit (talk) 22:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Hannah Montana (season 4). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 12:47, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Coronation Street. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Anemone Projectors 15:07, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Samantha & Haylie

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Samantha & Haylie, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AussieLegend (talk) 12:50, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Hannah Montana (season 4), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 16:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits to The X Factor (UK series 7). You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Anemone Projectors 15:15, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shakeitcecerocky (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I love wikipedia, when i was on The X Factor (series 7) I was putting true stuff about the semi-final / week 9 / december 4/5 2010

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information.
The last lot of edits were not true - you added data that has not happened WP:CRYSTAL, and also a table that was very badly formatted (final column went right past the references section) and no data except "TBA" - this is an encyclopaedia, not a newspaper, there is no need to rush. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:49, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

December 2010 part 2

Your recent edit to the page East Street (Children in Need) appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Anemone Projectors 21:17, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did in the article Coronation Square (Children in Need). Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you. Anemone Projectors 21:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Girls Aloud. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stephenb (Talk) 21:19, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Westlife, you may be blocked from editing. Anemone Projectors 22:11, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Anemone Projectors 19:41, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]