User talk:Shaizee

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Shaizee/sandbox (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:48, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Free and Fair Election Network (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Free and Fair Election Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Shaizee, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:14, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Free and Fair Election Network (December 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Arthur goes shopping was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Free and Fair Election Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Arthur goes shopping (talk) 13:39, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing images from Muhammad

Please don't remove the images from that article. There is a long-standing consensus that some images are allowed. Removing the images is a good way to annoy many of the long-term editors watching that article. If you have a look on the talk page, there's a way for you to block the images if you find them offensive. Regardless, please stop removing the images. Dolescum (talk) 09:00, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Muhammad. Favonian (talk) 09:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for your persistent removal of images against consensus and in violation of WP:NOTCENSORED, as you did at Muhammad. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

Instead of acknowledging the problems with your disruptive editing, you chose to resume it. Consequently, I have blocked you for a week, and if you do it again, the next block will most likely be indefinite. Favonian (talk) 09:35, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shaizee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Creating imagery or of Prophet hurts thousand of Muslims around the world as its insulting. I have made this disruptive editing on this prestigious knowledge sharing platform. Being a Muslim, it hurt me as well. I request you to remove these images related to Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Thousands of the Muslims will be obliged as sentiments involved.

Shaizee (talk) 12:25, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia recognizes that the inclusion of images is controversial in some, though not all, traditions. However, our policy on not censoring articles forbids us from taking any actions to delete or remove these images. I hope you can understand our position.

Instructions on stopping Wikimedia images from showing in your browser can be found at Wikipedia:Options to not see an image. PhilKnight (talk) 12:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Free and Fair Election Network (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deadbeef was:

Issues raised in the previous two rejections have not been addressed.

You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Free and Fair Election Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deadbeef 03:36, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pakistan Muslim League (Qayyum)

Hi, I'm Power~enwiki. Shaizee, thanks for creating Pakistan Muslim League (Qayyum)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It's unclear based on the article whether this group is still extent; I assume it is not as it ran no candidates in the most recent election. If references are available as to its fate, that would be useful information to add to the article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:40, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.S Philbrick (Talk) 11:41, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]