Jump to content

User talk:Shaionara

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello Shaionara! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page ,or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jerry 03:49, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Noticed you were fighting vandalism there. Good job :) Bakaman 04:06, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


This is not fair

[edit]

You cant overlook the references and proofs given against the fake allegations. First read the references given their correctly. And even allegations are not at all with any kind of valid proof. keyur 19:34, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who is to decide what is fake and what is genuine? I think we shoud include more frauds here if you wish to glorify wrong. Shaionara 02:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why not start a bio on Dhanushree Talwalkar and write about the controversies there? Or start a page called Pankaj Trivedi murder ? Bakaman 04:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You've got to be kidding me

[edit]

"Does the timings not prove that Sratneshwaran & Xihaou are same editor, interested to remove facts?) " I am a Recent changes patroller. A 33 year old guy from Nebraska who doesn't even know how to pronounce the page in question. Why would I sock puppet and revert vandalism from myself? That makes absolutely no sense? Look at my contributions [[1]] Look at his [[2]] how could you even make such a strange suggestion? I was reverting his vandalism of blankings of entire sections. He didn't follow the rules. He didn't discuss and follow the talk page consensus. He got turned in. Heck you reverted his mess and he just did it again before he got blocked for me turning him in. Please do not make such rash and obviously wrong assumptions. I don't even know what the article is about. I patrol the articles I revert vandalism. I read some. But if I was to only revert on pages I knew down pat, It would greatly limit my vandal fighting powers to many less than I do help now. Ive reverted vandalism on issues I detest but I don't let that influence me at all. Wiki is here to sereve a purpose of and people doing vandalism by blanking sections is just that vandals. In conclusion, please don't assume that I am the editor Sratneshwaran. Its so illogical if floors me. --Xiahou 04:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

swadhyay

[edit]

The article has been protected by an admin after being the victim of a massive edit war. I have started a discussion at Talk:Swadhyay_Parivar#Protected and I hope you will join me in attempting to reach a consensus on the article. Thank you.Bakaman 03:17, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Welcome

[edit]

Hi, it's been nearly a couple weeks now since I welcomed you as a new account holder. I see you have made some contributions, and are obviously getting the feel for things. If you have any questions or need any help, please do not hesitate to ask. Happy wiki'ing! Jerry 21:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]