User talk:Shahs227
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Keywordrenewals (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/keywordrenewals for evidence. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
|
Shahs227, you are invited to the Teahouse
[edit]Hi Shahs227! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there! This message automatically delivered by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2012 (UTC) |
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 14:39, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
August 2012
[edit]Hello, I'm Jojhutton. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Kluger Agency without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JOJ Hutton 14:11, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Kluger Agency, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 15:24, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]Your sole purpose here as a single purpose account (along with your aliases keywordrenewals (talk · contribs) and several anonymous IPs) seems to be removing anything negative about the organization with which you are affiliated, The Kluger Agency. That fact, and your refusal to discuss your removal of sourced information, is entirely unacceptable on Wikipedia. There are now many eyes on the article because of your abuse of editing privileges. If you continue this pattern, you will be blocked from editing. If you think something in the article needs to be changed, in the future you must first request the change on the article's talk page and let other editors make appropriate changes. Cresix (talk) 23:40, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:19, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/keywordrenewals for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. 66.102.83.61 (talk) 15:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)