User talk:Shahfahadx4

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahadx4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello sir, My native language is Pashto, in future I will use Pashto or Urdu because these are my home tongue languages سلام صاحب زما مورنۍ ژبه پښتو ده، په راتلونکي کې به پښتو او یا اردو وکاروم ځکه دا زما دکورنۍ ژبې دي Shahfahadx4 (talk) 08:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Great. Go right ahead - you are not blocked on those Wikipedias. PhilKnight (talk) 08:22, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:10, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sorry i was not aware of your rules i read your rules and i got it please help me to unlock my account Shahfahadx4 (talk) 15:37, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the instructions in the block notice above to see how to appeal this block. I would highly suggest reading Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks before appealing. -- LuK3 (Talk) 15:58, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i read it carefully and i will never do that next time Shahfahadx4 (talk) 18:27, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @LuK3 any update? Shahfahadx4 (talk) 08:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shahfahadx4 (talk) 08:29, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahadx4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello sir, i apologized for what i have done in past i was not aware of Wikipedia policies, i read all guidelines and now i am familiar with wiki policies. Shahfahadx4 (talk) 19:53, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Great. Please demonstrate your familiarity by telling us which policies you violated and how, and then telling us what you will do differently in the future, such as through telling what topics you might edit about. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahadx4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello sir, After demonstrating i found that i violate policy of Using Wikipedia for advertising purpose. In future i will always write article or create a page in the guideline of Wikipedia policies. Shahfahadx4 (talk) 20:39, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think you have enough proficiency with English to write encyclopedia articles on English Wikipedia. There is nothing special about English Wikipedia; it is not the "prestige version" of the website. You can submit articles in your native language by looking for it at m:List of Wikipedias. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:44, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahadx4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello admin, for the first I really apologize for what I have done. I was not aware of self-promotion is against the policies of Wikipedia. Now I have read all the policies of Wikipedia and that will never happen again. I will make contributions to Wikipedia that will not be related to my promotion if get unblocked.Shahfahadx4 (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not convincing. Your inability to follow simple directions here indicates perhaps en.wiki isn't the place for you at the moment. Yamla (talk) 20:09, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Requesting for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahadx4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello admin, for the first I really apologize for what I have done. I was not aware of self-promotion is against the policies of Wikipedia. Now I have read all the policies of Wikipedia and that will never happen again. I will make contributions to Wikipedia that will not be related to my promotion.I understand the blocking administrator's concern and they want to make Wikipedia better. Blocks happen because the community has to prevent certain behaviors, and I understand some things matter to you. I will really appreciate your concerns, good faith, genuinely learn from mistakes, and i will keep to the spirit of community policies.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:36, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

}

Requesting for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahadx4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will make contributions to Wikipedia that will not be related to my promotion.I understand the blocking administrator's concern and they want to make Wikipedia better. Blocks happen because the community has to prevent certain behaviors, and I understand some things matter to you. I will really appreciate your concerns, good faith, genuinely learn from mistakes, and i will keep to the spirit of community policies.This block is no longer necessary because I understand what i have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead

Decline reason:

This is just basically recycled text. Didn't you say you were going to the Urdu Wikipedia? I will be deleting the duplicate request, and warning you that these exchanges are becoming so unproductive that if you choose to file another request, and it's not radically different from the ones you have already filed, I will strongly recommend to that reviewing admin that your access to this page be revoked. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shahfahadx4 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

میں ویکیپیڈیا میں ایسے تعاون کروں گا جو میرے پروموشن سے متعلق نہیں ہوں گے۔ میں بلاک کرنے والے منتظم کی تشویش کو سمجھتا ہوں اور وہ ویکیپیڈیا کو بہتر بنانا چاہتے ہیں۔ بلاکس اس لیے ہوتے ہیں کیونکہ کمیونٹی کو بعض رویوں کو روکنا ہوتا ہے، اور میں سمجھتا ہوں کہ کچھ چیزیں آپ کے لیے اہم ہیں۔ میں واقعی آپ کے خدشات کی تعریف کروں گا، نیک نیتی، غلطیوں سے حقیقی طور پر سیکھوں گا، اور میں کمیونٹی کی پالیسیوں کی روح پر قائم رہوں گا۔ اس بلاک کی مزید ضرورت نہیں ہے کیونکہ میں سمجھتا ہوں کہ مجھے کس چیز کے لیے بلاک کیا گیا ہے، نقصان یا رکاوٹ کا باعث نہیں بنوں گا۔ ، اور اس کے بجائے مفید شراکتیں کریں گے۔

Decline reason:

It is clear that you are unwilling or unable to make a clear case for unblocking in English, therefore I have revoked your ability to edit this page. — Voice of Clam 21:03, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Most people on the English Wikipedia do not read Pashto or Urdu. I certainly do not. Please describe what constructive edits you would make. TBH, I do not see how you can contribute constructively to an Encyclopedia written in a language you cannot communicate in.

Per google.

I will make contributions to Wikipedia that are not related to my promotion. I understand the concern of the blocking admin and they want to improve Wikipedia. Blocks are there because the community has to prevent certain behaviors, and I understand that some things are important to you. I will truly appreciate your concerns, good faith, genuinely learn from mistakes, and I will abide by the spirit of community policies. This block is no longer required as I understand that what I have been blocked for will not cause harm or disruption. , and will instead make useful contributions.

-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]