User talk:Shadoman

Leave me a ~~massage~~ message here.

Whaddya think of my new suit!? listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Whaddya think of my new suit!?. Since you had some involvement with the Whaddya think of my new suit!? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That sucks. Oh well. It lived a full, healthy life. --Shadoman (talk) 20:54, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ebihara

I frankly do not give a fuck anymore and do not wish to embroil myself in this nonsense debate any longer. It has since been removed from whatever articles it was on, and I have nothing more to add to the two essays Optimussolo saw to add to my user page. In addition, "Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages". So do not revert me on my own talk page, again.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It also says not to edit or delete comments made by other users. But whatever. --Shadoman (talk) 20:28, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

User talk pages are subject to different rules than other talk pages. That's why I pointed out the fact that "Users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages". That means your comments.—Ryulong (竜龙) 20:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It still seems like poor sportsmanship, but I don't really care. --Shadoman (talk) 20:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JP voice actors are not just voice actors

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yoshimitsu&diff=530765708&oldid=529767120 --Niemti (talk) 16:10, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When he was saying they did "sound" for Yoshimitsu, it seemed pretty logical to assume they meant voice, especially since it was after mentioning that he was Law. Apologies if I misinterpreted. --Shadoman (talk) 16:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese voice actors are in the line "japanactor". --Niemti (talk) 02:30, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's what you meant. I feel silly now; I was in a rush and I misintepreted what you said. Carry on, then. --Shadoman (talk) 06:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Street Fighter (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Byrnes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mike Pollock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Pollock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Pollock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Shadoman. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shadoman. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shadoman. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Egg Quarters" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Egg Quarters and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 3#Egg Quarters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:37, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Egg Golem" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Egg Golem and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 3#Egg Golem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:39, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Polymascotfoamalate" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Polymascotfoamalate has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27 § Polymascotfoamalate until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer 1234qwer 4 00:10, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]