User talk:Shadic

Rom-Hacks

Hello, and thanks for getting in touch with me about my opinions on Rom-Hacks.

I'm afraid to say that, simply put, Rom-Hacks are not notable enough to merit their own space in wikipedia, in my opinion. Because of this, they violate WP:NN, which, while not policy or a guideline, is a general rule of thumb on wikipedia, discussing if a subject is notable enough to warrent article space here. The fact is, they're not sold in any major (or minor) store, and the video game press doesn't review or cover them, which, in itself, makes WP:V, a wikipedia policy, very hard to uphold.

Because of all these reasons, I feel that Rom-Hacks, as a general rule, should not be on Wikipedia. I hope that this clears up your question.

Th ε Halo ^Θ 22:53, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Response

This guy is ridiculous. A friend of mine who made a Rom-Hack has an issue of a magazine in which his hack was featured. Going by a rule of thumb on Wikipedia? I'm pretty sure that everything that should be followed is in the insane about of rules and guidelines for the site. Also, various communities have thousands of members centralized on Rom-Hacking, and if there is an article on Rom-Hacking in general, why shouldn't the most popular hacks have a page?

Shadic 21:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assassin's Creed 2

Hey, I saw you on the AC talk page supporting the split of the page. I was hoping you could put your vote HERE if you still believe AC2 deserves its own article. Thanks GroundZ3R0 002 (talk) 22:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:MushNightTitle.gif

A tag has been placed on File:MushNightTitle.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 02:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]