User talk:Shadiac

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ram Truck Timeline

Template:Ram Truck Timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Sable232 (talk) 03:40, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am keeping a copy of the template for myself and future use, though personally this is plain fucking bullshit. I won't debate it anymore. Shadiac (talk) 11:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010 Montreal International Auto Show

Ha, ha! I did that SAME THINGY as you for the Toyota Sienna & Ford Fiesta!!! I'm scheduled to upload more MIAS content than YOU! -- Bull-Doser (talk) 03:44, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I even made it to public domain so you can pretty much jerk off to these. Just don't drench your monitor.Shadiac (talk) 05:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of City car

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is City car. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/City car. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Starcraft II edit summaries...

...such as this aren't collegial. Wikipedia is a work in progress, and I have serious doubts about whether an article on a yet-to-be-released game can be "perfect" such that no one should modify (or "fuck with") it. –xeno^talk 18:05, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1) An article can be "fucking perfect" if, at the current state of writing, it doesn't incite others to "rewrite the crap of it" as not only is it semi-protected (for the same reasons), but also potentially sourced with good, verifiable content. 2) "(to) not to fuck with it" means (to) not vandalize the article in a way that might prevent valuable readers from having their brain hurt of jumping to words written by a twelve-year-old motherfucker, such as "yooo i got in2 tha b3ta bitchazzz toss rule foik!!" Shadiac (talk) 18:09, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In other news, I just lifted the protection. –xeno^talk 18:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What for? This can be considered vandalism. Shadiac (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's been over a month, and it was the first time it was protected. Per WP:PROT, pages should not be protected indefinitely unless they are "subject to heavy and persistent vandalism or violations of content". –xeno^talk 18:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but it was subject to heavy editing a/p noted above. I'm not debating your decision, I just think it will be put back in a day or so, see if I can be proved wrong. Also, let's move it to either your or the article's talk cause I shit a lot here =) Shadiac (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Automobile classification

Template:Automobile classification has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mighty Antar (talk) 00:50, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lentigo Picture

Hello Shadiac, Thank you for posting the Lentigo picture.. However, i believe it's really important to mention which part of the body is illustrated.. Thanks suka94ain Suka94ain (talk) 18:27, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, I'll get to that. Don't forget to ""link"" the links, Suka. Shadiac (talk) 18:28, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lulz

Hi buddy,

I hadn't got what you meant here "if palin reads this, she won't understand shit". What's the story with Mrs. Palin? Vlad fedorov (talk) 13:03, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, welcome to the United States of America. Would you like a green card? Shadiac (talk) 20:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, I could come to US without any green card. Maybe just for tourism. Common, what's the lulz? Vlad fedorov (talk) 03:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The lulz? You mean like this? Shadiac (talk) 06:14, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:M-2140 dash.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:M-2140 dash.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. • ɔ ʃ → 21:25, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File has been deleted. Please have a look at Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr, It shows that CC-BY-ND is not allowed. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:49, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Elantra2011.PNG

Thank you for uploading File:Elantra2011.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:54, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Penis

They vary greatly amongst different mammals and 2. you need a reference to claim that the testicles are part of it, because that's not true according to the dictionary. Thanks Tom my! 00:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tommy,

First of all, put the title of the section in brackets so I might click there.

Second of all, what dictionary are you alluding to? Wikipedia has a common right to state visual facts and opinions of majority. You don't need a dictionary to tell you that penis is an organ, right? Therefore, it is a statement of fact.

And finally, I'd like to invite you to a simple fact of not reverting BEFORE discussing the issue, because that would make you an asshole, and once you'll die (we all will), your conscience won't be clear.

Have a good one,

You friend Shadiac (talk) 00:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(1) read WP:BRD. (2) read WP:NPA. Edit summaries like these are a good way to get yourself in trouble, regardless of whether or not the revert was warranted. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 01:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadiac (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Delete my account please

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but it is not possible to delete an account. Please see WP:FAQ#How do I change my username/delete my account? —DoRD (talk) 02:26, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:DavidGuetta&ChrisWillisftFergie&LMFAO-GettinOverYou-sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DavidGuetta&ChrisWillisftFergie&LMFAO-GettinOverYou-sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 06:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DavidGuetta&ChrisWillisftFergie&LMFAO-GettinOverYou-sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DavidGuetta&ChrisWillisftFergie&LMFAO-GettinOverYou-sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:09, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TechnotronicftMondayMidnite-LikeThis-sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TechnotronicftMondayMidnite-LikeThis-sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]