Jump to content

User talk:Shadegan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Shadegan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! John Vandenberg (chat) 20:03, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Lori dialects

[edit]

There is already an article on Lurish at Lori dialects. --KP Botany (talk) 04:01, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

[edit]

Sorry, I don't know how to help, but this the English wikipedia. There is not lurish wikipedia, but there is a test-wikipedia. If you want you can go to incubator.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wp/lrc/Main_Page. SimonKSK 19:30, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lordegan County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bakhtiari. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luri language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sepidan, Lak people and Mamasani. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luri language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ilam, Khorasan and Feyli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

[edit]

Hello. You seem to be engaged in what is known as edit warring. This is not helpful to Wikipedia. It is important that if your opinion and that of another editor's differ, that you discuss the matter on the Talk pages of the affected articles and make a good-faith effort to reach a consensus about what to do. You do not seem to be doing that. You also don't seem to be providing edit summaries to explain the motivations of your edits. That is also not helpful. Please try to learn more about Wikipedia etiquette and try to have a cooperative attitude while working here. —BarrelProof (talk) 06:51, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luri language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ilam, Khorasan and Feyli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

selam

[edit]

selam setin del
khovi inshalla ze ichu be nia khom iyam komaket eradatMogoeilor (talk) 02:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luri language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ilam, Khorasan and Feyli. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

تشکر

[edit]

با تشکر از شما که در جهت احیای تاریخ قدم برمیداریدمصطفی ستاری (talk) 10:31, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lurish clothing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bakhtiari and Laks. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article try to introduce Feyli Kurds as Lurs. No Lur in Luristan , Charmahal va bakhtiari and Kohgeluieh va boyer ahmad in Iran consider himself as Feyli Kurd. All of them introduce themselves as Lur. Ilam and Kermanshah Kurds who had been under the control of Lur ruler for 4 centuries introduce theselves as Kurd. You can check wikipedia page for Kermanshah, Sarpolezahab,Ghasreshirin, Ilam, Islamabad, Gilanegharb , Eyvan , Malekshahi , Abdanan ,Sirvan and Chardavol. All of these regions didnt introduce themselves as Lur in Wikipedia page in contrast to what has been written in this page that Feylis introduce themselves as Lur. There is no Lurish clothing in above mentioned regions in contrast to what has been written in this page. in above mentioed regions some people use Kurdsih dress and some use Persian formal dress and no one dress Lurish dress. Lurish dress only is used in Luristan, Charmahal va Bakhtiari and Kohgiloieh and by some tribes (only some tribes ) in south of Ilam. Some tribes such as Shuhans, Selyverzis and Kaydkhordeh which comprise 10 % of Ilam province population. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.239.71.61 (talk) 11:43, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock me in Wikimedia

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadegan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Due to strict laws in Iran, we have to use proxies and anti-filtering softwares to edit in wikimedia space and no other reasons. Please unblock my IP. Best Regards Shadegan (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You forgot to provide your IP address. If you don't wish to do so publicly, you can use WP:UTRS. Note, though, that we don't normally unblock proxies due to massive abuse from these proxies. Yamla (talk) 11:59, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Shadegan. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elam

[edit]

I've reverted you there for two reasons. One, the lead is a summary of the article, and your text wasn't discussed in the article. Just as or even more importantly, we shouldn't be telling readers what the most reasonable assumption is. That's original research. This is just part of the learning curve for new or inexperienced editors. Doug Weller talk 14:39, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And normally we don't say "Some historians" unless we are quoting a source that says that. We name them. See WP:WEASEL. Doug Weller talk 14:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks dear Doug Weller, for your reccomendations. I hope my edits to be useful and satisfactory. Best Regards --Shadegan (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Kalhor (Iranian tribe) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doug Weller talk 12:33, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 16)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SweetCanadianMullet was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SweetCanadianMullet 04:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Shadegan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SweetCanadianMullet 04:28, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:LayliLurishdoll.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LayliLurishdoll.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This draft is still blank. Please do not resubmit a blank draft. If you are having difficulty in submitting a real draft, please ask for help at the Teahouse.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://home.earthlink.net/~rcfriend/danciran.htm. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Lur dancers from Mamasani.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lur dancers from Mamasani.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 15:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Baghdadi Lurish

[edit]

Hi, I'm Rentier. Shadegan, thanks for creating Baghdadi Lurish!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Would you please clarify the second paragraph of this article? Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Rentier (talk) 13:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

[edit]

I'm sorry, but I've blocked you for the edit war at Feyli Lurs and Feyli Kurds. This is clearly a sensitive issue and one which you and the other editor will need to discuss when your block expires. Nick (talk) 15:25, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Shadegan. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Shadegan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into History of the Lurs. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:36, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (History of the Lurs) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating History of the Lurs.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I had to remove extensive amounts of content that was copied from [1] in violation of copyright. Feel free to cite that source to rewrite the relevant sections, as it seems informative, but do not copy and paste content directly into Wikipedia.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 23:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Rosguill; thank you for your kind attention and recommendation, I promise to modify the mentioned errors as soon as possible. Best. SHADEGAN (talk) 14:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

resolving our disagreement

[edit]

Hey! Apparantly, you think you can make me ignore or accept what you've done to the article lurs, but I must say that I wont. I suggest we ask a third user's opinion because it is pointless to revert each other's edits repeatedly. You must know that we should both agree who this third user will be beforehand.Taddah (talk) 12:56, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Lurs shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I will have no other choice but to report you to administrators for edit warring if you keep going this way. Please stop.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 13:38, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI-notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Ahmedo Semsurî (talk) 14:49, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

I realize that there may be a language barrier, but your reasoning for the reverts, which includes unsubstantiated casting of aspersions about ethnic-driven edits, are not good enough. You need to explain yourself in more detail if you're going to revert someone's edits wholesale. Saying something like your last edit summary: Pan Kurd users are reverting all pages for their desire wishes, please have a look to the history of their planned ethnocentric edits is not up to par. El_C 20:16, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If it wasn't clear from my comment on your Incidents report, please do not engage in personal attacks again. There will be no third warning and you will be sanctioned. Thanks. El_C 16:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]

Hello Shadegan, maybe you are interested in this requested move Talk:Kurdistan Province#Requested move 2 June 2019, regards Coron Arol (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are also two requested moves in the articles Talk:Iranian Kurdistan#Requested move 2 June 2019 and Talk:Turkish Kurdistan#Requested move 2 June 2019 Coron Arol (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Shadegan. Jayjg (talk) 14:57, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

[edit]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Iraqi Lurs for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iraqi Lurs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iraqi Lurs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Semsurî (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Semsurî (talk) 13:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

[edit]

I have blocked you indefinitely for continuing with the "ethnocentric" personal attacks despite having been warned repeatedly about that. If you wish to appeal this block, please see the unblock template as well as directions on how to do best so. El_C 16:08, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment : @El C: Hi, sorry for the bother. While i have disagreed with SHADEGAN's conduct in the past, an indefinite block sounds, in my humble opinion, a bit too harsh. I do not excuse personal attacks, but this editor has tried to help build an encyclopedia in the past. To be honest, i think that their misconduct should be sanctioned, but maybe a long block rather than an indefinite one would be more relevant here. However, i'm not an admin and the decision is yours. Wish you a great rest of your day.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 03:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
An indefinite block is not necessarily infinite. If the unblock appeal is convincing, I or another admin are likely to unblock, immediately. The problem is that Shadegan does not appear to listen, repeating the same personal attacks again and again, despite multiple warnings. The unblock appeals also fail to demonstrate they understand this. The option of unblocking for six months and ending right back at the same place as before, simply did not seem like a sensible way to approach this. El_C 04:02, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, yeah, i get it. Thanks for your feedback. Shadegan, you need to demonstrate that you have understood why your conduct was misplaced. Best.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 04:13, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikaviani, Thanks for your kind attention. I accept my fault and I  apologize for that.There is no doubt that my words were not good But if  you take a look to the edit history of discussed and current edits, there is evident that the term "ethnocentric edit" is not irrelevant  and a should not be considered as a personal attack. By the way I will change my strategy towards a peaceful manner.--SHADEGAN (talk) 18:49, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Shadegan: Okay, so i encourage you to make another unblock request and wait for a patroling admin to review it. Best.---Wikaviani (talk) (contribs) 19:23, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HistoryofIran, LouisAragon,El_C, why are you incurious and indifferent about the unjustifiable current edits about Lur people, please see Iraqi Lurs edit history.SHADEGAN (talk) 14:55, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, myself, I'm not interested in the nuances of this content dispute. I'm only concerned with editorial conduct. El_C 19:26, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadegan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, User  Ahmedo Semsûrî that his edit trends and orientations are completely evident, has changed the contents of different pages (please have a look to edit history of these pages Laks (Iran), Laki dialect, Feylis, Iraqi Lurs, Baghdadi Luri,Lurs) towards his ethnic edit desire and wishes. I tried a lot to stop this trend and edits but surprisingly it was me to be punished!! It is completely evident for me that a wikipedia administrator is behind his unrestrained edits and supports that user. Hereby   I believe my blocking was not logical and impartial and I apply my request to unblock me. I will follow the wikipedia edit laws to pursue my incoming edits of course SHADEGAN (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadegan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ponyo,LouisAragon,Doug Weller I have been blocked indefinitely for what? I'm sure the trend is not usual and is impartial. Please have a look to my recent edit history and my activities and the users who were involved in this interactions. After more than 10 edit years, I have been blocked indefinitely because of using a word "ethnocentric"?!! SHADEGAN (talk) 12:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have been blocked indefinitely for repeated personal attacks despite warnings. Since you seem to see nothing wrong with your conduct, I have to decline this request. Huon (talk) 01:15, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadegan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I ask the authors and licensed users to unblock my account because I commitment to modify my upcoming edit issues. I have not been aware about the disputes and discussions method.SHADEGAN (talk) 13:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This appears to be a deliberate attempt to waste our time with a pointless unblock request which does not address your personal attacks/harassment. Yamla (talk) 13:25, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shadegan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I have read and accepted contents of WP:NOTTHEM and WP:GAB and I have requested several times to be unblocked. I do not know how to write in case to be accepted by administrators and other authorized users. Please somebody help me. SHADEGAN (talk) 12:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you have once again completely failed to address the reason for the block, despite having had it pointed out to you repeatedly above, this appeal is declined. You appear to be either unable or unwilling to formulate an unblock appeal that actually deals with the problem, so I am revoking your talkpage access to prevent you wasting any more of our time. Yunshui 雲水 12:51, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shadegan&oldid=1143299117"