User talk:Shaan Vinoth

Shaan Vinoth, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Shaan Vinoth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello, I'm Armegon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Godzilla vs. Kong have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please do not add unsourced content or manipulate sourced content. It is disruptive, please see W:DE. Armegon (talk) 20:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Shyamal. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please note that we welcome contributions to Wikipedia that are made with integrity. It is clear that the vast majority of images that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons were downloaded from the internet and claimed as taken by you in Mudumalai. This is gross violation of all forms of ethics and conduct. Any repeat violation will lead to permanent banning. Shyamal (talk) 08:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well hello, you are undoing edits from this article and please refrain from doing so. Before you say no, copyright information check all the other national park articles. I am just adding them. And it seems you are discarding any edit from me, even if its true. Im trying to improve articles of all national parks in the Western ghats. Shaan Vinoth (talk) 12:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Shyamal. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mudumalai National Park, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Shyamal (talk) 12:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mudumalai National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gudalur. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Your edit to Mudumalai National Park has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Kuru (talk) 13:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

See here. This was a straight copy from the given source - please do not do that. Kuru (talk) 13:46, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Shaan Vinoth, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Godzilla vs. Kong does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Politanvm ^talk 05:03, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Re attribution, I concur with @Diannaa: but think it redundant to copy-paste content from the page on Nilgiri Mountains to the other pages on protected areas within this mountain range. Copying UNsourced text does NOT improve these pages at all. – BhagyaMani (talk) 13:06, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summary

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Rasnaboy (talk) 13:10, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. I will add summaries from now onwards Shaan Vinoth (talk) 13:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already several times, I provided links to WP:BAREURLS and WP:CITEHOW in my edit summaries, but you keep on ignoring the guidelines provided under these links. If you do not understand them, then please get them translated to your native language. – BhagyaMani (talk) 17:50, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Info on ecoregions, biomes and habitat types is indeed usually placed in the section Geography, whereas info on plant species is placed in the section on flora. – BhagyaMani (talk) 17:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Why do you insist on displaying low quality images in the Mudumalai NP page?? The day-time image of sloth bear and the night-time one of 2 gaurs are both BLURRED, so that animals are hardly recognisable. I noticed several images of gaur in the resp. Commons pages, which have a much better quality, i.e. are sharp and taken by day-time. – BhagyaMani (talk) 08:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You cheated so often by violating copyright of images – 30+ as of now, that I do not trust that you really took any of the others on site, but just clicked them from your screen. Therefore, I suggest you refrain from adding these to pages, the more so as most are low quality anyway. Of course, we can discuss images also on the talk pages of resp. pages, whatever you prefer. – BhagyaMani (talk) 17:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Try finding that pic on any site, you simply can't Shaan Vinoth (talk) 17:29, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently you never bothered to read some of the basic guidelines, or you disrespect them? One of the main purposes of wiki pages is to provide written reliable content. But your continuous adding, removing, replacing of images is not at all constructive. Use your sandbox for such experiments!! Test image layouts there with different resolutions and sizes of screens to learn that 3+ images in one row is unsuitable for small screens. And then DISCUSS your changes on talk page!! -- BhagyaMani (talk) 06:29, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well fine then. Id remove all excessive images Shaan Vinoth (talk) 12:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The term 'wet deciduous' for a forest type does NOT exist : it's either 'moist deciduous' or 'wet hill forest', latter a forest type in NE India acc. to classification by Champion & Seth. So please don't mix up terms. – BhagyaMani (talk) 12:39, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I name it moist broadleaved forest then Shaan Vinoth (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can, but it is not really necessary because 1) the relevant page is already linked, and 2) 'deciduous' makes clear that all the trees in this forest loose their leaves in the cold season, +3) this caption is a 1-liner, whereas adding 'moist' might become a 2-liner. Test it by previewing the layout.– BhagyaMani (talk) 14:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since I have removed two images from the Fauna section, Avifauna subsection so it doesn't seem conjusted, can I add another one or two images in other sections Shaan Vinoth (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I meanwhile consider your repeated adding of spelling + punctuation mistakes disruptive and strongly recommend you to get familiar with basic spelling + grammar rules. All you did is playing around with images, which is NOT at all constructive. – BhagyaMani (talk) 09:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arkham Asylum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bane.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Morbius (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 09:21, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Please stop making non-constructive edits like you recently did with the page Ooty. Please go through WP:NOTGALLERY, understand that Wikipedia is not a photo album and do not add unnecessary images and add clutter to the page. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

Magentic Manifestations (talk) 09:37, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Hi, I have already warned you multiple times against disruptive editing of to the page Ooty. Again clearly specifying the problems with your edits:

Removing/blanking content from the lead without due reason WP:VANDAL
Selectively removing certain castes from the history section WP:CASTE
Do not add unwanted images that add clutter to the page WP:NOTGALLERY
Any changes to existing images without justification WP:BRD

You have already made more than three reverts to the page on the same content and doing it over time, evading the WP:3RR. You seem to be not inclined to provide valid references, justification or due cause and engage in a discussion as well. If you continue to engage in doing the same edits, without any discussion or consensus, you will have to be reported for the same. Magentic Manifestations (talk) 03:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]