User talk:Sferrier

Welcome!

Hello Sferrier, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some good places to get you started!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please be sure to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or just three tildes (~~~) to produce your name only. If you have any questions, or are worried/confused about anything at all, please either visit the help desk, or leave a new message on my talk page at any time. Happy editing, good luck, and remember: Be Bold!

FireFox^{T C E} 17:31, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

confusing personal message

(i don't see any way to communicate with you other than putting my text here.)

"Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks."

that's the message i got from you. i have no idea what it means, or what it refers to, or if i am even the correct recipient. you have a strangely self-assured tone for somebody who hasn't made it clear what in god's name you're talking about, so maybe i am not the intended recipient.

i've never performed any "tests." recently i've added comments to a few DISCUSSION pages, about critical issues relating to whatever subject at hand. i added to the DISCUSSION pages, not the main articles, because of the problem that i described: certain individuals erase content not based on its merit or its relevance for an encyclopedic entry, but based on their own taste or distaste with the facts presented. in this case, i didn't think i'd be "treading" on even the most neurotic wiki-stewards, since i was.... discussing..... on the discussion page.

so with that in mind, i have to assume that your message is nothing but a trumpeting of the fact that you disapprove of my additions to the "discussions" and rather than confront those elements on their own terms, you've deleted them altogether.

this might surprise you, but the last time i actually edited an ARTICLE, a moderator messaged me to compliment my contributions and suggested that i make a registered account.

so with that in mind, i think you're out of line, and i'd like to know what you deleted and why you did it. (on another note, your use of the term "our" in "our encyclopedia" seems to have excluded me, and seems to miss-- or maybe malign-- the fact that it's as much mine as it is yours.)

Good day.

The message you received from me was a template message in responce to an article that was vandalised from someone at your IP address. My message and action are, I believe, in accordance with the Wikipedia policy on how to deal with vandals. The article in question was W.E.B. DuBois - it was blanked out completely (you can view my action on the article's history page). You have my apologies for you receiving this message in error, however for users that choose not to register, we (including you) have no other means by which to communicate with those users. In fact, repeated acts by unregistered vandals from your IP address can actually result in that IP address being banned from Wikipedia. Hence, I would also urge you to take the admin's advice that you mentioned and create a registered account - it will prevent further such misunderstandings in the future.

Kind regards, Shawn 18:40, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Consider leaving the message left on my talk page on the IP addresses talk page, I think it will be more of use there! Fir e Fo x 18:55, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete

Hi Sferrier, I just ran across your 'AfD' tag on " A Coathanger Abortion" . I didn't change anything, as I'm no expert here, but check out the Wikipedia:Speedy deletions. That would easily fall into the {nonsense} tag, or some such, and then would just be cleared by an Admin. Cheers --Bookandcoffee 09:49, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Chardon, Ohio

Thanks for your help in cleaning this article up with the vandalism — it's one of many cities/towns from my area on my watchlist, and I can't understand why it's such a nightmare compared to the others. Some days it's nothing but your mom jokes. Anyway, it felt really good to not have to be the reverter this time. :) Jacqui ^★ 00:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jacqui.

Thanks for the kudos. ☺ I loved your comment about reverting the vandal's mom!! :) Shawn File:SFerrier Talk Redirect.png 07:14, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:SFerrier Talk Redirect.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:SFerrier Talk Redirect.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-14 04:37Z

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]