User talk:Sf-000

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sf-000. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! S.G.^(GH) _ping! 21:15, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of ships of the Bangladesh Navy, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 19:22, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bangladesh Navy, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. None of what you added is supported by any form av reliable source, which is totally unacceptable. This is an encyclopaedia, not a fanblog, so either provide reliable sources for everything, or don't make any edits. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 20:07, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BNS Bangabandhu (F-25)

Hello Sf-000,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, BNS Bangabandhu (F-25), may be copied from http://bangladeshdefence.blogspot.com/2010/11/bns-bangabandhu-frigate.html. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 19:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Bangladesh Air Force, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The claims you made in your edits, about things being confirmed and aircraft etc being ordered, are not in any way supported by the existant references in the article, since all you did was adding new claims while keeping the old references. Which is not acceptable behaviour. Thomas.W ^{talk to me} 20:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bangladesh Air Force may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|site1=<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.baf.mil.bd/index01.php |title=[ Bangladesh Air Force ] |publisher=Baf.mil.bd |date=2012-12-17 |accessdate=2013-05-21}}</
"| [[Infrared homing|Infrared Guided]] [[Air-to-air missile]] || ! style="text-align: center;"|[[[Chengdu J-7#Export variants|F-7BGI]] ||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:12, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BNS Anirban

The article BNS Anirban has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New article completely unsupported by refs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BNS Durdondo

The article BNS Durdondo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

New article completely unsupported by refs.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:09, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bangladesh Air Force

G'day, I see you have added a lot of information to the Bangladesh Air Force article, but you have not cited any sources. Unreferenced information may be removed at any time. Also, the plural of "aircraft" is "aircraft", it is like the words "sheep" and "fish". Cheers YSSYguy (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

here is the source. Please add it to citation http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/bangladesh/air-force-modernization.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.179.212.10 (talk) 05:02, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Please participate

There's a voting going on here. It needs to close, but consensus is not certain. We need more participation. The issues can't remain without a resolution. Please, check it out. Closure of the discussion has started. (refresh) Please, hurry. nafSadh did say 14:10, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BNS Durdondo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BNS Durdondo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BNS Durdondo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Equipment of the Bangladesh Army, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Don't add it again unless you have reliable sources supporting everything you add. Thomas.W ^talk 18:35, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Bangladesh Navy

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Bangladesh Navy without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 02:21, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Policy

Hi, noticed you reverted my edits on BNS Somudra Avijan. Next time edit summary as to why is required and in the future, please read and follow Wikipedia policy concerning ship articles. Thanks for your time. Llammakey (talk) 09:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violation

Some of your uploads have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. MilborneOne (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CGS Rangamati

Hello Sf-000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged CGS Rangamati for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. // Posted by larsona (Talk) // 22:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ship disambiguation

Hi Sf-000. Please read WP:SHIPDAB for an explanation of how to disambiguate ships. Cheers. Manxruler (talk) 10:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 04:07, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sf-000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason stated for blocking is sock puppetry of Bishal Khan. But I don't have any connection with that account and I don't think we have similar edit history. So, allegation of sock puppetry is false.

Decline reason:

Given that you are blocked based on WP:CHECKUSER results, I think it's safe to say that you are not being honest. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:14, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sf-000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The reason stated for blocking is sock puppetry of Bishal Khan. But I don't have any connection with that account and I don't think we have similar edit history. Also, I never supported Bishal Khan or any other accounts in Category: sockpuppets of Bishal Khan in any topic. Please check those facts. The allegation of sock puppetry is false.

Decline reason:

As mentioned above, you were blocked after a CheckUser check. This is generally considered highly reliable, and certainly enough so that the "I am not a sockpuppet" rationale - even repeated twice - is insufficient to support unblocking. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:52, 4 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sf-000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have never done spamming or any type of vandalism in any topic. Also I have never supported any account of Categories: Wikipedia sockpuppets of Bishal Khan in any topic. Even I never saw these accounts in the topics that I usually contribute.

Decline reason:

Repeating yourself will not result in a different answer. HighInBC 15:48, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sf-000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BNS Jamuna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BNS Jamuna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BNS Jamuna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 01:55, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]