User talk:Sevomaritsa20

Welcome!

Hello, Sevomaritsa20, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! bobrayner (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 15:30, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DMacks (talk) 01:19, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge tag

Do not remove the {{mergeto}} tag from Armenian Mexican until the matter has been decided. You may add your thoughts to the discussion at Talk:Armenian Mexican, but removal of the tag without discussion makes it impossible for consensus to be reached on the matter. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:51, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than trying to subvert the consensus process by removing or changing merge tags, why not actually enter into the discussion on Talk:Armenian Mexican. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:51, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your multiple removals of the merge template, rather than any attempt to discuss the matter, I must come to the conclusion that you have no interest in consensus. I'll let other weigh in though. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:08, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

November 2012

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Armenian Mexican, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:19, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Armenian Mexican, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:02, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fake population statistics

Hi,
This edit deliberately changed a number from 3000 to 20000. The source says 3000, so it looks like you deliberately added false information. Some of your other edits have had similar problems, such as this and this. If you keep doing this, you will get blocked. I strongly recommend that you use sources. bobrayner (talk) 09:56, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents about this. bobrayner (talk) 10:17, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Rich wales 07:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In order to have the above indefinite (i.e., no automatic expiry date) block lifted, you will need to acknowledge that you understand the issues that have been raised — specifically, that you must not make random, unsourced changes to population figures (you need to come up with newer, better sources to justify changing the figures, or else leave them as they are); and that you must participate in good faith in talk-page discussions and must not do things like removing notices from articles or talk pages without first achieving a genuine consensus that the issues in question have been resolved. Not only must you show us that you understand the problems, but you must also assure us that you will change your editing behaviour accordingly; otherwise, you should expect that any request to be unblocked will be turned down. Please be aware that trying to sidestep this block by creating a new account, or by editing "anonymously" without signing in with your account, would be considered a serious violation of policy and would most likely be taken as meaning you have no intention of following the rules and need to continue being blocked. — Rich wales 07:12, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]