User talk:SevereFactor
Welcome!
[edit]
|
SevereFactor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not sure which edit I made that supposedly contained original research. I believe this must be a mistake, and would like to see which particular edit is in question. Thank you.
Decline reason:
The block is a Checkuser block, which means it is for the misuse of multiple accounts. That is what you will need to address if you wish to be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:23, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock}}
- If you look at your block log you will see the reason given as "checkuserblock-account", which I have explained above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
SevereFactor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm quite surprised at the new stated reason of my edits and comments (what comments have I even made?) being "racially tinged". Could you please elaborate? I have no idea how any of my edits had anything to do with race, whatsoever. Thank you. SevereFactor (talk) 20:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
One unblock request at a time. The only appearance of "racially tinged" on this page is your statement here. You are blocked because you are a confirmed sockpuppet (see WP:SOCK) of Quisp65. This is the documented reason you are blocked, not for original research and not for being "racially tinged". Please address this abuse of multiple accounts in your next unblock request, unless you wish to lose access to this talk page. Yamla (talk) 20:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note! If you are that user, you are not eligible for unblock consideration here. You must make your request with your original account. --Yamla (talk) 20:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
SevereFactor, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi SevereFactor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC) |
February 2019
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Please don't delete sourced content and add unsourced or editorial content. Thank you, 2601:188:180:1481:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)