User talk:Seven of Nine

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! If you need help feel free to drop a line at my talk page. :) --Actown ^e 05:07, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Melatonin safety

Just wondering where you got the "five hours" from in your recent edit of Melatonin? The safe time must be dose-dependent, and indeed subject dependent as different people metabolise melatonin differently. A less definite description of the time should really be used. Elroch 23:11, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection, I think my comment above was rather pedantic, and I found a link that gave a similar practical recommendation [1], so feel free to ignore my suggestion. Elroch 01:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ways psychoactive drugs affect the brain

Greetings :) I noticed you seem to have some knowledge in this section of the psychoactive drug article, and was hoping that maybe you'd be able to clean up that section a bit, and also (hopefully) be able to cite some references for it. Thanks :) --Thoric 21:49, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, tried to clean it up a bit, still needs much work though. --Seven of Nine 14:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Benzodiazepine equivalence

Your recent edit war with User:John Cho has turned nasty. Often disagreements are better discussed on the talk page than in edit summaries.

The table of benzo equivalence should ideally come from one reliable and reputable source. You have one source and User:John Cho has another. I think it best that both you and User:John Cho stop editing this table. I have asked User:Fuzzform (ProjectBenzo) if he can decide on a good source to be used consistently. If he can't, or you disagree with that choice, please discuss on the talk page or over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Drugs.

Regards, Colin°^Talk 21:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your change to the article Drinking

Here you changed the word alcohol to ethanol. Why? You didn't explain it at all in your edit summary, and it seems like an odd change to me. It may be chemically more accurate to say ethanol, but to the general user (Wikipedia's target audiance) it makes more sense to say alcohol. Perhaps if we changed the link to point to Alcoholic beverage it would work better? What do you think? ~ ONUnicorn (Talk / Contribs) 15:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad; changed it to Alcoholic beverage. --Seven of Nine 03:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seven,

I'm glad to see you here. Ready for re-assimilation? :-P --BorgQueen 03:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Equilenin.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Equilenin.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Equilenin.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Equilenin.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ball lock

Please don't take it personally (I've had articles deleted, too, and didn't appreciate it). However, an article about sticking padlocks on testicles really did fit Wikipedia's definition of notability. That's why I recommended it for deletion -- the actual decision to delete it was with the site's administrators. Ecoleetage (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no hard feelings. I will try not to take it personally. --Seven of Nine (talk) 21:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ethanol NFPA rating

I reverted your ethanol NFPA rating change. Although there are older MSDS including the one in the ethanol citations showing a 0-3-0 rating, the health rating is "2" per the following NFPA meeting minutes: http://www.nfpa.org/Assets/files/AboutTheCodes/704/CLA-AAA_ROPminutes_01-10.pdf I will replace the MSDS in the citations with an updated version.Sandcherry (talk) 03:24, 17 May 2011 (UTC) Nothing has changed. It is still 2.JSR (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:05, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Seven of Nine. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:21, 28 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Seven of Nine! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userrights

While I should have left you a note, I can see you're happy with your new rights. :) Yes, after a review of your contributions I felt you'd make good use of those tools. Let me know if you need anything else. Best. Acalamari 22:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion involving transgender issues

You may want to be aware of and possibly join in: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)/Archive 121#MOS:IDENTITY clarification. Skyerise (talk) 06:57, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Seven of Nine. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Seven of Nine. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Seven of Nine. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]