User talk:Settherecord

Settherecord, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Settherecord! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, I'm 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Settherecord. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);

when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I expanded on content in the Early Life section. This is my first time editing wikipedia. Thank you for the tips.

Hello, This is my first time editing wikipedia, aside from a project in college I did once. I apologize for my earlier mistakes, especially the copyright violations. I'm trying my best to follow all of the wikipedia editing guidelines. I do not have a COI. Thank you for all of your help! SetTheRecordSettherecord (talk)

August 2017

Hi, if you continue to delete relevant, sourced content that you don't like, I will request this account be blocked. Thanks, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:53, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, If you want to add the sentence back saying MC is friends with Chris Palladino, can you please quote a reputable source directly, word for word? Thanks. I wasn't able to find a direct quote from a reputable source. Settherecord (talk) 04:52, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am a new wikipedia editor. I will read through the sources again but it's my belief that they don't meed wikipedia standards for reliability. You're citing a gossip type book aren't you? Thanks! Settherecord (talk)

You can believe whatever you like, but two editors who have made hundreds of thousands of edits on Wikipedia disagree with you. You obviously have a COI, you are obviously here to promote the subject of the article. Drmies (talk) 03:25, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, yeah, sure--I'm being paid to remove the promotional bullshit you keep adding to the article. Maybe it's the guy whose Channel swim record was broken by the subject's father who's paying me! Please. You're making a spectacle of yourself. Drmies (talk) 03:33, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are being paid by Mr. Dan Biederman. He wants to trash Michael Capponi. They are involved in a dispute regarding his daughter and the boating accident. Mr Biederman is trying to link him a former mob person, and highlight his past substance abuse, to paint him in a negative light. I hope your wiki career is worth whatever you're being paid. paid.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Biederman

Nice. Yeah, I get paid in cocaine. I've already run into that Biederman article; it's just as bad as this one, but has fewer pictures. Those rich white dudes all think they rule the world, don't they. I hope you realize how stupid your accusations are--maybe have another look at the Biederman article. Drmies (talk) 04:05, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's true. I supply Drmies with the cocaine and he wrecks the article for me. I don't have a choice! I'm being pressured by the alien race from the Delta Xeloron galaxy! It's either this, or they use their Abujara inhibitors to annihilate the Zababaaba dwaramoni apparatus in Sector XXubu! What would you have done if you were in my shoes?!!! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:47, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:07, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it sounds like you didn't get my hint above. Your accusations are without evidence and completely unjustified. Due to your disruptive editing and harassment towards Drmies with your repeated accusations without evidence or justification, you are blocked from editing. Once your block expires, you're welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS

Well done. Drmies (talk) 23:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you! ~~

September 2017

Your recent editing history at Selena Gomez shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. General Ization ^Talk 03:38, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Settherecord reported by User:General Ization (Result: ). Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 03:46, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Talk:Selena Gomez.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 14:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Let me please implore you to drop the puppy issue at Selena Gomez because if you continue pushing the issue I'm afraid that another block may be coming your way. Second blocks are almost always longer than first blocks. Only you can decide whether to avoid another block. Sundayclose (talk) 22:33, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]