User talk:Settdigger
September 2012
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:48, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Settdigger (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I believe I made a number of constructive contributions. Bbb23 has made it personal, which is unfortunate. Settdigger (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
First, we don't accept unblock requests attacking others. Second, now matter how many constructive contribs do you have, you edit-warred relentlessly and made a lot of unconstructive edits. Max Semenik (talk) 18:17, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note from blocking admin. Please see this topic at ANI for recent background.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Settdigger/sandbox
[edit]User:Settdigger/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Settdigger/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Settdigger/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:43, 13 October 2015 (UTC)