User talk:Sethhater123

Award

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Sethhater123, I award you this barnstar for contributing to (79360) 1997 CS29. Most of the article wouldn't have been possible if you hadn't contributed. Kamope 14:09, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing discussions on talk pages

Do not remove discussions or notes on talk pages unless you are removing your own notes. Removing someone elses notes on talk pages is considered vandalism. Just to let you know. Kamope 19:08, 4 January 2007 (UTC) But I'm too embarrassed to have other people see this stuffSethhater123 19:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Sethhater123[reply]

?

Can you use your barnstar I gave you for the recent news on the talk page for (79360) 1997 CS29? Like my new signature?

Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 01:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

!

Do you want to join the WikiProject Astronomical Objects? If you do click on the link, read the page, and if you want to join in, click on the link list your name under the members. Kamope | userpage | talk | contributions 23:03, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of the Koenig's and their friends...

Dear Sethhater123,

Though I know you're just doing a part of what every good Wikipedia editor does, I've been asked to thank you on behalf of Andrew's and Walter's friends and family for your efforts in un-vandalizing Andrew's page during these difficult times for them.

With much thanks, RobertMfromLI | User Talk 03:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

move request for 79360 Sila–Nunam

I opened a move request in Talk:79360_Sila–Nunam#Requested_move. You are receiving this notice beause you have made substantial changes to the article. --Enric Naval (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deborah Blee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deborah Blee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deborah Blee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 15:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]